On Thursday 10 May 2007 02:24, Ladislav Slezak wrote:
> The cause is the transition to libata IDE drivers. Libata currently doesn't
> support DMA mode change. See
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264681#c14 for details.
Thanks for the fedback Ladislav.
I had similar error messages l
Rajko M. wrote:
[...]
> You said that they are IDE drives on older 500 MHz system, so hdparm should
> be
> right application. I'm not familiar with hdparm internals so I ran test on my
> older computer with 10.3 alpha 1 and it shows the same error, although I used
>
> symlink hda that points
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-05-07 at 20:42 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
> I never tried to find out exact reasons for the one side grounding.
Loop currents.
They would form 40 independent loops, and a loop in a variable magnetic
field, such as induced by the varyin
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007 09:43, Sid Boyce wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
...
The speed test
hdparm -t /dev/hda
shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For
details on transfer rates
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT01170100
The differen
Rajko M. wrote:
Grounds commoned on motherboard side will show shorts on the other end too.
Wires are to short to see 2 wire lengths resistance with DMV, so it will
appear as short on both ends. They had to use existing ground pins on 40 pins
connector and they needed 40 extra wires between e
On Monday 07 May 2007 09:43, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Rajko M. wrote:
...
> > The speed test
> > hdparm -t /dev/hda
> > shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For
> > details on transfer rates
> > http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT01170100
> >
> > The
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 17:51, Donn Washburn wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:
Has anyone noticed this problem? It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
with the sda drive and not hda
Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to y
On Sunday 06 May 2007 17:51, Donn Washburn wrote:
> Rajko M. wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:
> >> Has anyone noticed this problem? It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
> >> with the sda drive and not hda
> >
> > Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:
Has anyone noticed this problem? It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
with the sda drive and not hda
Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you.
The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote:
> Has anyone noticed this problem? It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing
> with the sda drive and not hda
Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you.
The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s.
How much lower
Hey Group;
I have someone with a old AMD K6-2 500Mhz baby MB. It has 2 IDE hard
drives on a 66 bus. hdparm and /dev/sda and /dev/sdb seem to have
problems. I had a felling that SuSE may be using them as idebus=33 and
not 66. So, I was going to check using hdparm and set it on. However,
t
11 matches
Mail list logo