Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default extensions for our implimentation.

2012-05-22 Thread Roger Luedecke
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 08:31 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 21 mai 2012, à 14:40 -0700, Roger Luedecke a écrit : > > We included some extensions to fix some issues with Gnome. I wrote an > > article on extensions, and would like to submit the listed extensions in > > that article for consider

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default extensions for our implimentation.

2012-05-22 Thread Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar
Quoting Richard Brown : I dont think that we should be adding other extensions by default, but I would like to see if there are ways we can encourage people towards extensions.gnome.org to install their own "some" work has happened on that front, see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default extensions for our implimentation.

2012-05-22 Thread Michael Hill
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Andrew Wafaa wrote: > I actually like the default behaviour. One of my favourite things about openSUSE is its faithfulness to upstream GNOME. Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+ow

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default extensions for our implimentation.

2012-05-22 Thread Richard Brown
>>> Andrew Wafaa 05/22/12 10:02 AM >>> >I would rather we had no extensions shipped by default, but that's just >me :-) I'd agree, if the alt-status-menu functionality was built in by default Having that extension as a default is exceptional to solve what I consider to be a very important usabi

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default extensions for our implimentation.

2012-05-22 Thread Andrew Wafaa
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 08:31 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 21 mai 2012, à 14:40 -0700, Roger Luedecke a écrit : > > We included some extensions to fix some issues with Gnome. I wrote an > > article on extensions, and would like to submit the listed extensions in > > that article for consider