Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork and marketing repository

2011-02-16 Thread Helen South
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:17 PM, jdd j...@dodin.org wrote: Le 16/02/2011 02:28, Pascal Bleser a écrit : CC-BY-SA 3.0 what we *have* to discuss early is *the way* ,the licence can be repsected. It's easy for text, but for posters, photos, videos it's much more difficult. If we have to

Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork and marketing repository

2011-02-16 Thread jdd
Le 16/02/2011 09:33, Helen South a écrit : For complex documents with many sources, perhaps it would suffice to point to a file on Gitorious with 'Full license and attribution here: link' don't know if this is allowed. But the main concern is for * printed material (or material exposed on

Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork and marketing repository

2011-02-16 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 02/16/2011 10:04 AM, jdd wrote: Le 16/02/2011 09:33, Helen South a écrit : For complex documents with many sources, perhaps it would suffice to point to a file on Gitorious with 'Full license and attribution here: link' don't know if this is allowed. But the main concern is for

Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork and marketing repository

2011-02-15 Thread Bryen M. Yunashko
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 02:28 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote: As blogged about here: http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-repository-for-opensuse-artwork-and.html Instructions are here: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Marketing_and_Artwork_repository Question is, of course, whether we

Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork and marketing repository

2011-02-15 Thread jdd
Le 16/02/2011 02:28, Pascal Bleser a écrit : CC-BY-SA 3.0 what we *have* to discuss early is *the way* ,the licence can be repsected. It's easy for text, but for posters, photos, videos it's much more difficult. If we have to insert the licence and the authors name *in the photo* it's a