Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
the should be under the same prefix IMHO. The should not be in some
standard lib path to avoid clashes with existing gcc4 build libs. This
means also that
Nah, that is
Am Sunday 12 March 2006 16:40 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
Hi folks
Following issue: to set the %{DISTRIBUTION} header in my RPMs, I use
the following trick in my spec files:
Distribution: %(head -1 /etc/SuSE-release)
When one doesn't explicitely specify the Distribution: tag, the RPM ends
up
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime
libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the
software did not understand how to
On Sunday 12 March 2006 16:40, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Following issue: to set the %{DISTRIBUTION} header in my RPMs, I use
the following trick in my spec files:
Distribution: %(head -1 /etc/SuSE-release)
That's nasty.
When one doesn't explicitely specify the Distribution: tag, the RPM ends
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
It would be nice if RPM(build) did something like
#include /etc/rpm.d/*
when pulling macro definition files because that way, one could
provide his macros as an RPM package and BuildRequires it in the
spec file.
Actually it
On 2006-03-13 12:14:47 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
/etc/y2pmbuild/files/*/etc/rpm/macros
Ok. Unfortunately y2pmbuild is no option for me, I have my own build
scripts that better fit my environment (and that support any
BuildRequires syntax).
i am getting bored telling you that the
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2006-03-13 12:14:47 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
/etc/y2pmbuild/files/*/etc/rpm/macros
Ok. Unfortunately y2pmbuild is no option for me, I have my own build
scripts that better fit my environment (and that support any
BuildRequires syntax).
i am getting bored telling
On 2006-03-13 17:28:25 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
I have 10.0, 9.3, 9.2 and 9.1
And I have a different process for signing RPMs, where to deposit
binary RPMs and builds logs, where to fetch sources from (with a local
cache or from the SVN sandbox), automatically transform URLs to fetch
