Hi all ;-)
I have two packages
a) php5.rpm
Provides: php(tzdatabase) = 2007.9
b) php5-timezonedb.rpm
Supplements: php(tzdatabase) < 2007.11
I expect php5-timezonedb to be installed automatically by the package
manager when php5.rpm provides an older version of php(tzdatabase)
however it
On Tue, Jan 08, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> We have about 1.5 dozen files (EG inittab) that are owned by openSUSE
> and SLES, and also owned by an RPM that holds our product.
>
> I gather this is generally considered poor practice - just how bad is it?
Very simple: the result is undefined. This works
We have about 1.5 dozen files (EG inittab) that are owned by openSUSE
and SLES, and also owned by an RPM that holds our product.
I gather this is generally considered poor practice - just how bad is it?
If we install the OS, install our product, then remove our product, are
we in for losing
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2008-01-07 17:41:23 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
It looks like "rpm2cpio | cpio -icvt" isn't a good test for users and
groups, because my rpm's were coming up with lots of files owned by
root, but when I actually apply the rpm's, the files are coming up with
the cor
On 2008-01-07 17:41:23 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> It looks like "rpm2cpio | cpio -icvt" isn't a good test for users and
> groups, because my rpm's were coming up with lots of files owned by
> root, but when I actually apply the rpm's, the files are coming up with
> the correct owners now.
>
On neděle 06 leden 2008, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
>
> But the issue I found is that mc.spec defines
> Requires: %{name}-lang = %{version}
>
Maybe Recommends would fit better here. The package can definitely work
without the lang subpackage.
Vladimir
--
