Re: [opensuse-packaging] -Uvh different from -e followed by -ivh?

2008-01-24 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2008-01-24 11:04:21 -0700, Bart Whiteley wrote: > I've had to resort to that exact solution once before. Use > %triggerpostun instead of %triggerun. ("%triggerpostun -- foo" in > foo.spec). Since %preun and %postun of the old package run after %pre > and %post of the new package, it's really t

Re: [opensuse-packaging] -Uvh different from -e followed by -ivh?

2008-01-24 Thread Bart Whiteley
Dan Stromberg wrote: > Bart Whiteley wrote: >> Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Dan Stromberg schrieb: >>> However, now I'm finding that I can repeatably: 1) Install 3.1.0.0 of the rpm 2) -Uvh 3.1.0.3 of the rpm 3) The files under the original hierarchy di

Re: [opensuse-packaging] -Uvh different from -e followed by -ivh?

2008-01-24 Thread Dan Stromberg
Bart Whiteley wrote: Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: Hi, Dan Stromberg schrieb: However, now I'm finding that I can repeatably: 1) Install 3.1.0.0 of the rpm 2) -Uvh 3.1.0.3 of the rpm 3) The files under the original hierarchy disappear. The files under the secondary hierarchy become prese

Re: [opensuse-packaging] -Uvh different from -e followed by -ivh?

2008-01-24 Thread Bart Whiteley
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: > Hi, > > Dan Stromberg schrieb: >> However, now I'm finding that I can repeatably: >> >> 1) Install 3.1.0.0 of the rpm >> 2) -Uvh 3.1.0.3 of the rpm >> 3) The files under the original hierarchy disappear. The files under >> the secondary hierarchy become present. My %po

Re: [opensuse-packaging] error: %post(yum-3.2.8-11.2.x86_64) scriptlet failed

2008-01-24 Thread Christoph Thiel
Thank you very much. Applied. Best, Christoph On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:29:40PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak wrote: > Christoph Thiel wrote: > > Any patch to the specfile will be greatly appreciated ;) > > Problems is that expression /etc/yum.repos.d/* will expand to > /etc/yum.repos.d/* when there are