Re: [opensuse-packaging] Split licenses.rpm (based on 'Building packages with linking a license from licenses.rpm')

2007-07-25 Thread Robert Schiele
as you start removing licenses from there you might break older packages installed on a system. Sure you can find solutions for all these problems but in my opinion it will just produce a bug mess and source of inconsistencies. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Building packages with linking a license from licenses.rpm

2007-07-25 Thread Robert Schiele
licenses > symlinked. If the FSF insists on having a copy in each RPM every Linux distributor that separates libraries and headers in separate sub packages has a problem anyway since typically the license is not in _all_ sub packages. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker m

Re: [opensuse-packaging] problematic new path naming structure

2007-03-20 Thread Robert Schiele
> are just my 2 cents here :-). We won't solve the issue here. There is no real problem and thus there is nothing to solve. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpDGL9OI12jG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] problematic new path naming structure

2007-03-20 Thread Robert Schiele
ith my statement. > > And one could remove the reference to the individual kernel entirely: > Call the directory /lib/modules/persistent from the very begin. Maybe one > would like to use persistent-default / persistent-bigsmp. This does not work because it does not allow insta

Re: [opensuse-packaging] problematic new path naming structure

2007-03-20 Thread Robert Schiele
could just check for files in directories whether they are registered with a package and only delete the directory if none of them is. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpxMf2u62oJM.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] problematic new path naming structure

2007-03-20 Thread Robert Schiele
odules/2.6.18-persistent No, this does not work since there is no guaranty that the module works with _any_ version of a 2.6.18 based kernel. > or whatsoever. Keeping the old name is a poor and irritating choice. Feel free to suggest a better scheme but only suggest a scheme th

Re: CrossToolchain packages (was Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain)

2007-03-13 Thread Robert Schiele
? If you really want to consolidate that stuff then why don't you answer to my mails regarding that topic I sent to you and the list more than two weeks ago? Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.&q

Re: [opensuse-packaging] .la files and dependencies, again

2007-02-27 Thread Robert Schiele
cause it could sill operate perfectly with (the new) beta.so.1 (and thus alpha.so.2). I hope this made this topic a bit more clear. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpqrAix36wnA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: CrossToolchain packages (was Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain)

2007-02-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:20:33PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:29:47PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 04:14:17PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > Versions used are: > > > > > >bin

Re: CrossToolchain packages (was Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain)

2007-02-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:29:47PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 04:14:17PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > Versions used are: > > > >binutils gcc > > avr: FactoryFactory > > m68k-noos: 2.16 4.1.1 > >

Re: CrossToolchain packages (was Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain)

2007-02-25 Thread Robert Schiele
.4.5-20060117-1 > msp340:2.17 3.2.3 Unfortunately the platforms I have put there (mingw and msp430) currently have a major bug or no support in the binutils/gcc versions as present in Factory. Thus as long as I don't find the time to fix/port to these versions an extra version is n

Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Schiele
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:22:46PM +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2007-02-23 19:14:34 +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > > Since no project name was suggested for 6 weeks I just took > > CrossToolchain:mingw. Unfortunately a linker crash occurred for all 10.0 or > > new

[opensuse-packaging] Re: msp430 cross-toolchain

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:18:29PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > Hello! > > For those interested: I have packaged a cross-toolchain for msp430 based > systems including the firmware for the ESB, ECR, and eGate platform. You can > find everything at http://pi3.informatik.uni-mannh

Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Schiele
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:40:32PM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > > Robert Schiele wrote: > > > I have packaged a cross-toolchain for Windows machines based on the latest > > > releases of the mingw gcc por

Re: [opensuse-packaging] .la files and dependencies, again

2007-02-22 Thread Robert Schiele
This does not only save much CPU power for building but can also reduce the number of versions of a package because you never keep packages with identical content. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum

Re: [opensuse-packaging] .la files and dependencies, again

2007-02-22 Thread Robert Schiele
fortunately doing so is likely to be more work than just managing the dependencies manually. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpHNYVVBDMVR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] .la files and dependencies, again

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Schiele
brary case in a smart way but you cannot say that listing this dependencies is completely wrong. The design of the tool just does not match all use cases in a really good manner. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpWqZTdRCgz1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] .la files and dependencies, again

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Schiele
ary directly it might be a requirement to link to this specific library when using static libraries because another library you are using depends on that. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpPswZwjxQ1D.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] cleaning the buildroot correctly

2007-02-15 Thread Robert Schiele
; > + /bin/rm -rf /var/tmp/gnucash-docs-2.0.1-build > ++ dirname /var/tmp/gnucash-docs-2.0.1-build > + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp > + /bin/mkdir /var/tmp/gnucash-docs-2.0.1-build Well, if you rely on this then there is no point in the above command anyway. Robert -- Robe

Re: [opensuse-packaging] location of devel symlinks for libraries

2007-01-17 Thread Robert Schiele
und, leading to the result that the tool can no longer find it's data after moving it. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpo4r1MyUkwn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain

2007-01-11 Thread Robert Schiele
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > Robert Schiele wrote: > > I have packaged a cross-toolchain for Windows machines based on the latest > > releases of the mingw gcc port. You can find everything at > > http://pi3.informatik.uni-mann

[opensuse-packaging] mingw cross-toolchain

2007-01-09 Thread Robert Schiele
Hello! I have packaged a cross-toolchain for Windows machines based on the latest releases of the mingw gcc port. You can find everything at http://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~schiele/suse/. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Qui

[opensuse-packaging] msp430 cross-toolchain

2007-01-02 Thread Robert Schiele
-current-toolchain-p8105657.html and http://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mailman/private/scatterweb/2006-December/000368.html Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpc9YFwj0NGW.pgp Descri

Re: [opensuse-packaging] A way to provide gpg key?

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Schiele
y want to do and don't bash other solutions just because you _think_ that what someone else is doing is stupid without actually discussing it. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpekuJj0wR2a.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] A way to provide gpg key?

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Schiele
expect "Enter pass phrase:"\nsend "\\r"\nexpect' | expect You can also substitute "rpm --addsign" with the command you are actually using. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpEZ3vhSQVu1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] A way to provide gpg key?

2006-11-09 Thread Robert Schiele
SLES9 & 10. > It would be really nice to automate all the passkey entries so I can run > it all in one batch. Just remove the passphrase from your key. It does not make any sense to encrypt your private key with a passphrase and then store this passphrase somewhere on the disk for a batch p

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Versioned provides ??

2006-06-16 Thread Robert Schiele
valid system with rpm into a special root directory without installing rpm within this special root directory itself. Who should provide the symbols in that case. Another point is that these symbols specify features that are required for _installation_ of the package and not for running the a

Re: [opensuse-packaging] XML Project in the Build Service

2006-06-01 Thread Robert Schiele
el free to propose new tools and make use of > http://en.opensuse.org/SGML_and_XML . If it is planned to maintain (some of) the following packages there as well I'd be happy to join: - Xerces-c - Xalan-c - dbxml (and friends) Robert -- Robert Schiele T

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Interchange for SUSE also requires non-threaded perl.

2006-05-09 Thread Robert Schiele
to). Well, maybe they use code that is not thread safe but use modules that make use of threads if available. Actually I don't know if this really is the problem but one possible cause. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mai

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Dear "packager" of mozilla firefox

2006-05-02 Thread Robert Schiele
e a faked server will most likely never give you a security warning whatever you do. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpxAvSJeVYy4.pgp Description: PGP signature

[opensuse-packaging] squashfs

2006-04-01 Thread Robert Schiele
Hello everybody! For everybody working in the embedded systems area: I now have packaged squashfs for 10.1 on i586 and x86_64. Get it at http://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~schiele/suse/10.1/ and have fun. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Distribution: tag

2006-03-15 Thread Robert Schiele
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2006-03-13 19:18:13 +0100, Robert Schiele wrote: > > You might find the answer yourself if you ask yourself why you don't use > > y2pmbuild at SUSE internally to build the distribution. > > y2pmbu

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Distribution: tag

2006-03-13 Thread Robert Schiele
f you ask yourself why you don't use y2pmbuild at SUSE internally to build the distribution. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpN0y5A1y6Qt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package

2006-03-13 Thread Robert Schiele
Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." pgpKgExJrUfKM.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package

2006-03-13 Thread Robert Schiele
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote: > Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele: > > Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime > > libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the > > softwa

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package

2006-03-10 Thread Robert Schiele
untime libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the software did not understand how to do shared library versioning correctly. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine

[opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package

2006-03-10 Thread Robert Schiele
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:36:38AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote: > I meant to for the compat runtime libraries. No nead to package them again. They are already in compat-libstdc++. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EM

[opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package

2006-03-10 Thread Robert Schiele
put > them to avoid conflicts) ? > > Does anyone have some hints ? Any special directory will do. /opt/gcc33 (or whatever version you want to provide) would be appropriate. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAI