On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:26:38AM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> We do not speak about the lib from the compiler here, but about independend
> libs on top of it. You do only get different sonames for libs, if the build
Ah, ok. Then we were really talking about different things here.
Robert
Am Monday 13 March 2006 09:58 schrieb Robert Schiele:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> > Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
> > > Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime
> > > libraries in an extra directory is onl
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
> > Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime
> > libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the
> > software did not understand
Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> > the should be under the same prefix IMHO. The should not be in some
> > standard lib path to avoid clashes with existing gcc4 build libs. This
> > means also that
>
> Nah, t
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> the should be under the same prefix IMHO. The should not be in some standard
> lib path to avoid clashes with existing gcc4 build libs. This means also that
Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Schröter wrote:
> Am Friday 10 March 2006 11:36 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
>> Robert Schiele wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:17:53AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Apart from that, I'd be willing to provide gcc3 packages for SUSE Linux
Am Friday 10 March 2006 11:36 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> Robert Schiele wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:17:53AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> >> Apart from that, I'd be willing to provide gcc3 packages for SUSE Linux
> >> in my repository (for C and C++) but... what would be the best place for
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:36:38AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> I meant to for the compat runtime libraries.
No nead to package them again. They are already in compat-libstdc++.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:17:53AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>> Apart from that, I'd be willing to provide gcc3 packages for SUSE Linux
>> in my repository (for C and C++) but... what would be the best place for
>> it, how to
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:17:53AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Apart from that, I'd be willing to provide gcc3 packages for SUSE Linux
> in my repository (for C and C++) but... what would be the best place for
> it, how to best handle those compat library packages (i.e. where to put
> them to avo
10 matches
Mail list logo
