On Monday 07 August 2006 13:15, houghi wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:56:09PM +0200, Frank Sundermeyer wrote:
> > this is due to the fact that we want to be compatbile to the
> > MediaWiki styles. At the moment we are loading the original
> > Monobook styles and overwrite parts of them a
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:56:09PM +0200, Frank Sundermeyer wrote:
> this is due to the fact that we want to be compatbile to the MediaWiki
> styles. At the moment we are loading the original Monobook styles and
> overwrite parts of them afterwards with customized styles.
> In regards of performa
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:54, houghi wrote:
Hi,
> Now this all does not mean that there can not be any speed
> improvement: http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/
>
> A nice page that shows how fast things download and also pinpoints
> the main problem to the css files that are wa
houghi a écrit :
Then where is the 2MB coming from?
I used wget to have a local copy of the fr site (not to be
done each day :-) and looked at properties in konqueror
but I didn't do that on this purpose but used an old
verison, may be a little bigger now.
but with a 20kB medium size for
houghi a écrit :
Now this all does not mean that there can not be any speed improvement:
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/
thanks for this URL, very interesting
for opensuse.org:
Total HTTP Requests:27
Total Size: 97912 bytes
Object Size Totals
Object type Size
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> however I effectively tried to read the wiki from this 56k
> line and was unable to do so. I have yet to investigate
> where is the bottleneck. the html given by mediawiki is
> quite awfull, and page size (around 15-20 kbytes) are pretty
>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:02:28PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> Marcus Rueckert a écrit :
> >[snip]
> >1. the wiki is doing on disk caching already and delivers that for
> >anonymous user.
> >2. the content size would be the same you still need to download the
> >whole site.
>
> I don't say to make it avai
houghi a écrit :
This even makes it less clear why my comment would be useless. It looks as
if you are also not in favour of it.
probably he though the answer was so obvious that your
comment was too much :-()
I know php gives html so most wiki users read html pages
directly from the cache
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:14:31PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2006-08-03 15:08:06 +0200, houghi wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > > On 2006-08-03 13:58:05 +0200, houghi wrote:
> > > > If it is not dynamic and up to date like openSUSE is, I am ag
On 2006-08-03 15:08:06 +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > On 2006-08-03 13:58:05 +0200, houghi wrote:
> > > If it is not dynamic and up to date like openSUSE is, I am against it.
> >
> > omg houghi. what an useless commment.
>
> Why?
h
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2006-08-03 13:58:05 +0200, houghi wrote:
> > If it is not dynamic and up to date like openSUSE is, I am against it.
>
> omg houghi. what an useless commment.
Why?
--
houghi
Quote correct (NL) http://www.briachons.org/art
Marcus Rueckert a écrit :
[snip]
1. the wiki is doing on disk caching already and delivers that for
anonymous user.
2. the content size would be the same you still need to download the
whole site.
I don't say to make it available in zip form
are there here 56k modem users that can confirm the
On 2006-08-03 13:58:05 +0200, houghi wrote:
> If it is not dynamic and up to date like openSUSE is, I am against it.
omg houghi. what an useless commment.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:36:10PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> this could be quite simple to do and appreciated by many users
Till now you are the only user who is asking for this. 2MB for a website
is a LOT more then I would want to download. What you are talking about is
to have the content available of
[snip]
1. the wiki is doing on disk caching already and delivers that for
anonymous user.
2. the content size would be the same you still need to download the
whole site.
3. check the cache settings of your browser.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is g
jdd a écrit :
For example I have a wget generated copy of the french wiki, only 2Mb in
size!
by the way, the first distribution testing for braille
tablets could also have a version for visually disabled (w3m
compliant), but there wget is not so good. I think they are
in the mediawiki softw
If you follow the various openSUSE mailing lists, you may
know I use to advocate we must take into account the so many
low end harware users.
This is not only for helping the poors, but also because I'm
very confident than the coutries that have such problem
today will be in the first place i
17 matches
Mail list logo
