I meant for all three expression languages :)
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> Sure:
>
> assuming the ValueStack has a single object in there called "action":
>
> "name" -> action.getName()
> "person.name" -> action.getPerson().getName()
> "map["blah"]" -> action.getMap().get("blah
Sure:
assuming the ValueStack has a single object in there called "action":
"name" -> action.getName()
"person.name" -> action.getPerson().getName()
"map["blah"]" -> action.getMap().get("blah")
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Ottinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good point, I'll look in to that more. "map['blah']" doesn't work, so this
could be a problem indeed. I'll ping the Ognl list and get back to you guys.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:37 AM
Sub
I guess I'd like to see the actual expression used:
(calls "foo.getBar()," or...)
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Rickard Öberg wrote:
> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> > You can find more about the syntax at www.ognl.org, but here are some
> > examples compared to WebWork:
> >
> > Ognl -- WebWork
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
You can find more about the syntax at www.ognl.org, but here are some
examples compared to WebWork:
Ognl -- WebWork
"name" -- "name" :)
"person.name" -- "person/name"
"map["blah"]" -- "map['blah']"
How does this work in JSP's? isn't going to
work
You can find more about the syntax at www.ognl.org, but here are some
examples compared to WebWork:
Ognl -- WebWork
"name" -- "name" :)
"person.name" -- "person/name"
"map["blah"]" -- "map['blah']"
"array[0]" -- "array[0]"
-- "../name"
That's about it! Haven't figured ou
ActionContext.getContext().getName should return what you are looking for.
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Ottinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] How to get the action name?
> Jack, I've asked for this
Jack, I've asked for this myself before. I'd still like to see it put in
place - maybe XWork will do it? - but for now, you'll have to add some
custom code in order to get this done. (Maybe I'll write a patch.)
However... I'm not sure your problem as explained needs the solution
you're asking for.
I'm just learning Webwork, and so far I think it's great. I have one problem though,
for which I couldn't find any answer from the documentation nor this list. So I hope
someone could be able to help me out here:
I have a java action class MyJavaAction.java (of course I have others too but they
Can someone make a list comparing the three? That way we can see what each
one gives us. I'm sure Maurice would have preferred JSTL's EL, and when
JSP 2.0 comes out, most people will expect the standard as well.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> So the current XWork code uses the ex
Where specially in the findValue is the bottleneck?
I was expecting to see this implemented with JavaCC but I don't know if
that produces anything that's quicker.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://
Rickard,
I haven't done any decent benchmarks, but I did run some very simple tests,
and after Ognl's expressions were cached and the first few action requests
were sent through, I was getting responses in the ~5-10ms range. Things
could probably be speed up even more, especially in the area of act
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
So the current XWork code uses the existing WW expression language as is,
only using Ognl for setting/getting properties as well as type conversion. I
was playing with making an OgnlValueStack and it's literally 10 lines of
code and MUCH faster. I was thinking that between
So the current XWork code uses the existing WW expression language as is,
only using Ognl for setting/getting properties as well as type conversion. I
was playing with making an OgnlValueStack and it's literally 10 lines of
code and MUCH faster. I was thinking that between JSTL and Ognl, the need
f
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
OK, as you may have seen, XWork is in the sandbox CVS module. I'd like you
all to take a look at it and let me know what you think. The main changes
are:
I'll take a closer look at it soonish.
One Q though: do you have any thoughts on performance? In the old WW
there
Erik Beeson wrote:
The view releated stuff consists of all the features available in JSP
available in velocity, cleaned up taglibs, and Tea support. Are people
expecting anything else?
I guess the most important idea is to put all features into plain
JavaBeans so that they can be used from any
16 matches
Mail list logo
