Incident Information:-
Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipients: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:[OS-webwork] Re: Application
The file your_details.zip (details.pif) you received was infected with the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was deleted.
__
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [OS-webwork] Re: Application
Scanning Time = 06/26/2003 18:27:17
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/577
Watch out folks, Maurice has been infected! :)
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:12 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Application
> -- Virus Warning Message (on the network)
>
> Found virus WORM_SOBIG.
Your mail to 'Webwork-devel' with the subject
Re: Movie
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message body is too big: 111484 bytes but there's a limit of 40 KB
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
Absolutely. We agree!! :) If you need truly rich functionality, you
should be writing a client app. However, if you are required to be web
and can do javascript, then use it. I'm just suggesting that something
as simple as bringing a div to the front is very easy to make cross
platform and may be
Hey Armond,
I recommend that you open a JIRA issue for this and attach the patch. We'll
get to it real soon.
- Original Message -
From: "Armond Avanes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:33 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Multipart & SaveDir
> Hi WebWo
Nor should you, to be honest. You're trying to jam a square peg into a
round hole. Yes, you can get pretty far, but in the end, a user will
get an email with a link, and will click on it and boom, their browser
window with all your lovely javascript is now replaced. Or maybe the
user gets s
Hi,
Anybody got this problem.
Iam gettig velocity exception HashMap class cast exception if i try to
access TreeMap like this simpleMap.get($key).
Iam not getting error if use the HashMap.
Is it something like webwork supporst only accessing HashMaps.
Thanks,
Ajmal
--
These are good arguments. But I still think you can never reach the same
functionality with a browser based app compared to 'traditional' (native)
clients.
> IMO, if you want to create a web application that acts like a desktop
> application, JavaScript is your best buddy. If you want to create a
Just my thoughts on it:
> - some IT departments do not allow JavaScript (Active Scripting) for
> security reasons
Generally, the it security departments I have worked with (mostly banks
and investment firms) allow javascript. What they don't allow are
activex and sometimes applets (though I think
Wow, are you the famous man who's name turned into a verb ?
> Well the two are completely unrelated. J2EE has no user interface
> guidelines, it is not specific to browsers (it does define servlets
> which deal with http though, but that's as 'browsery' as it gets). So
> the question of how wel
IMO, if you want to create a web application that acts like a desktop
application, JavaScript is your best buddy. If you want to create a web
application that acts like a web site (click, wait, click, wait) then don't
use it.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Well the two are completely unrelated. J2EE has no user interface
guidelines, it is not specific to browsers (it does define servlets
which deal with http though, but that's as 'browsery' as it gets). So
the question of how well javascript and j2ee mix is akin to asking how
well buildings and l
> Lars, just out of curiosity, what is driving the requirement for not
> supporting the complete browser model (no javascript)?
These are some of the reasons:
- some IT departments do not allow JavaScript (Active Scripting) for
security reasons
- my applications should work with the most common
I see your point, Mike. I was thinking in terms of medium length tasks,
not truly long running. You mentioned that the javascript approach is
very error prone. Are you referring to differences between browsers, or
is there something else?
In terms of very long tasks, I actually did something li
The "in progress" page is shown when the process is finished (the
action has completed). As Jason said you have to start thew process
asynchronous.
> Don't forget our cool new HTTP 204 trick that we just learned.
>
> Display the "in progress" page, and then have a refresh ping the server
> period
I never use JavaScript because my application has to work the same
way even if JavaScript is turned off.
> I haven't actually done this yet (but am planning to) -- however, can't
> you take care of this behavior with dhtml?? It seems like you could
> call a javascript function on submit that pull
Maybe with some kind of scheduler. Because I'm using an EJB container
I'll try JMS.
Thanks again !
Lars
> Well, for us we queue a JMS message. I'm not sure of another way to
> start an asynch process in the J2EE spec
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Rainer,
Please re-submit.
It looks like it was lost with the crash.
Cheers,
Scott
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
Scott,
thanks for your quick reply.
Shall I resubmit the issue or wait until you could track down the problem?
cheers,
Rainer
--
ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com
Expert J2EE Software, S
Scott,
thanks for your quick reply.
Shall I resubmit the issue or wait until you could track down the problem?
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woperstr. 34 tel: +49 (0)170 - 3432 912
D-52134 Herzogenrath
Rainer,
This may have been due to the server crashing overnight. We restored
from backups, but any issues created in the 12 hours or so before that
may have been lost.
However, there I have seen the occasional duplicate key, and we are
trying to track down how this could occur.
Cheers,
Scott
21 matches
Mail list logo
