[OS-webwork] WebTable (LinkCellRenderer) question

2003-08-05 Thread ian
how would i include a static request parameter for a webtable LinkCellRenderer? say my link is going to be Action?bar=123 .. but I want to pass the information along for the currently loaded "foo" as well, so when a user clicks on a generated link, they'll go to Action?bar=&foo= ? -

Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.3

2003-08-05 Thread Dick Zetterberg
Sounds good to me! Will the form tag include the token/single submit functionality? (I'm not sure exactly how this was implemented in WW2 so if I am way off then never mind). Cheers, Dick Zetterberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Hani Suleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[E

RE: [OS-webwork] Doing a for-loop using webwork.util.Counter...

2003-08-05 Thread James Pan
Thank you very much Mike, the expression you gave me worked wonders!! > -Original Message- > From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 7:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Doing a for-loop using > webwork.util.Counter... >

[OS-webwork] [JIRA-Opensymphony] Created: (XW-72) Config reloading doesn't detect changes in included xml files

2003-08-05 Thread legendaryservice
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XW-72 Here is an overview of the issue: --

[OS-webwork] Test failed when building Webwork2

2003-08-05 Thread Marco Papini
Hi all, I've checked out webwork2 module from SF (amazingly ;) ), and tried to build it (target dist). 2 tests failed: - com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.ui.PasswordTest - com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.ui.TextfieldTest My fixes follow (hope they're correct): RCS file: /cvsroot/opensymph

Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.3

2003-08-05 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Scott Farquhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hani Suleiman wrote: > > To all non webwork2 junkies: > > > > Any objections to adding ui:hidden and ui:form > tags to webwork 1.3? > > Not from this side of the pond. > > Go for it. would be cool. What about moving ww1.3 on java.net for non-co