sf.net mailing list sucks, i onced wrote and email to the list and it
took 3 days to finally get delivered
Robert Douglass wrote:
PS. does anybody know why it takes 6 hours for mail to be delivered?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Robert Do
Should I run "patch" or just zip up the changed files?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donatio
Takes about 10 minutes for me. :)
D
Robert Douglass wrote:
PS. does anybody know why it takes 6 hours for mail to be delivered?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Robert Douglass
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 3:43 PM
To: WebWork list
Subjec
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:58:16PM -0300, Samuel Mota wrote:
> Would be nice If the SessionComponentManager object could go over all
> instanciated components and IF they are implementing the
> HttpSessionBindingListener inteface it should call the Bingind methods
> (both of them) ... anyone else
Hi,
Thanks for your response, things are a bit clear for me :) ... but I'm in trouble now,
is there some
workaround for this?
The class that is going into the HttpSession is the
SessionLifecycleListener!SessionComponentManager
instance ... not my component object directly (it is builtin the ma
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:40:05PM -0300, Samuel Mota wrote:
>
> I've extended the SessionLifeCycleListener class from Xwork to override the
> sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent e) method, but the session when this method is
> called is totally
> empty ...
>
> Webwork is inserting my component at
Xwork is failing the setProperties test which is waiting for Ognl 2.6.4
to fix the null handling...
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] the state of refactorings
whats
I'd be happy to help out. What should I do so I'm not duplicating
others efforts?
--- Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm close to releasing beta 2 of XWork and WebWork - however there
> is
> are two major roadblocks:
>
>
>
> 1) 20 open bugs - I'm closing them as fast as
Starting the day after beta 2 is released (which, if people
can help pitch in, will likely be this weekend), I’m planning to add an
entry each day for a month on various features in WebWork 2.0 to my blog. I’d
love it if someone wanted to consolidate these and get them on the wiki or in
som
i was in the process of writing the CheckboxListTagTest but the tag is
broken, I passed the tag the list but I am unable to get it it from the
checkboxlist.vm as $tag.list, is someone working on fixing this?
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
whats the state of all the refactorings that took place, are
Yeah, sorry... I implemented it, but haven't had time to get the
examples working or get it into the TLD
> -Original Message-
> From: Cuong Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] i18n example app po
I've done the same thing with jsp tags, if anyone finds useful.
I was going to try to implement the text tag for that
but realized it's already in CVS :)
--- Robert Douglass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> as an exercise for myself, I've implemented the i18n example app
> using WW2
> an
--- Samuel Mota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've sette up a component with Session lifecycle ...
> it's working like a charm, but my session
> component adds an application scoped reference to
> the user (he can login only once) ...
>
> When the session ends I must clear the reference a
Hi Matt, Patric and all others!
I've been using a special VelocityResult and WebWorkVelocityServlet
(JIRA WW-288 (LARGE hack!)) in WW2 that is an extension of the
VelocityLayoutServlet in Velocity Tools. Those files depended a lot on
the old implementation of how the tags och velocity template is
I have a related problem. I am overriden the ActionSupport's getLocale() but
it never gets called. Any ideas?
/Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Robert Douglass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 23 oktober 2003 16:43
To: WebWork list
Subject: [OS-webwork] i18n & Velocity
Hi all. I've be
whats the state of all the refactorings that took place, are there still
many more planned to come in?
currently xwork is failing unit tests, webwork is passing all the tests
though.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation
You can order the book right now from Amazon.. and it will be delivered as soon as they receive it..
I'm waiting for my copy
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 23:23, Francisco Hernandez wrote:
let us know when you guys finish up the book so I can order it!
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> Might I add that t
let us know when you guys finish up the book so I can order it!
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Might I add that this is one of the coolest features to come in WebWork
-- if you don't see the power in it just ask and I'm sure more than a
few can give real world examples. I used it last night (hence Matt'
I’m close to releasing beta 2 of XWork and WebWork –
however there is are two major roadblocks:
1)
20 open bugs – I’m closing them as fast
as I can (or moving them to post 2.0), but any help here would be great. Patches
+ unit test would be best
2)
UI tag tests – I’ve done anot
19 matches
Mail list logo
