Re: [OS-webwork] OT: Wiki [Was: Webwork 2.0 example app]

2003-02-25 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, I've also been using SnipSnap for a personal KM system and generally like it. Patrick Lightbody wrote: Yup, I personally like SnipSnap, but it's got a lot of missing features that make it just not good enough. Mainly: 1) Email notifications 2) Revision history The developer's thoughts:

Re: [OS-webwork] CommandDriven

2003-02-20 Thread Bill Burton
Google for command pattern instead. -Bill Matt Ho wrote: Could you concisely explain what you mean by CommandDriven? A google search on (command driven pattern) returns only 1,500 non-topical entries. I have a working definition based on the existing code and your comments, but a more

Re: [OS-webwork] OSCache + Velocity (Was: Webwork 2.0)

2003-02-14 Thread Bill Burton
Aapo Laakkonen wrote: Create an issue with the details in jira please. No need to create, they have been created a long time ago: 02/Jun/02: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=SIM-18 Thanks for pointer on this. I'll try to get it updated with some ideas I have. -Bill

Re: [OS-webwork] set method on action from velocity

2003-02-13 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, G.L. Grobe wrote: Anyone have ideas or comment further on what I might be doing wrong here. I have a velocity view that creates many checkbox's after a dbase query. The getter method in my webwork action is called but the setter method (which I expect to be called for each checkbox on

Re: [OS-webwork] OSCache + Velocity (Was: Webwork 2.0)

2003-02-13 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Patrick Lightbody wrote: We could probably write some velocity-oscache integration. Francois, is this possible? Yes it's possible and I think someone may have had something working a while ago but I don't know what ever happened ... To cache whole JSP pages OSCache uses a servlet

Re: [OS-webwork] Wiki dammit

2003-01-28 Thread Bill Burton
Jason Carreira wrote: Can someone please explain to me how to publish a page on the Wiki? I can't seem to find a link to create a new page Gaah! I just set up SnipSnap and ran into the same issue. 1. Log in. 2. Enter the desired topic into the Search fill-in and click the button. 3. Below

Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity for View Tags

2003-01-28 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Scott Farquhar wrote: (Also available here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-111) I have looked at changing the view tags over to velocity, and it is looking very promising. I have attached the text.vm text.jsp files for a comparison, and it cleans the code

Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags

2003-01-28 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Attila Szegedi wrote: - Original Message - From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for the UI tags snip/ Actually if I understand it right, the integration is

Re: [OS-webwork] Struts Converts

2003-01-03 Thread Bill Burton
Hi Matt, Could you post your Struts comparison info into the Wiki (http://www.opensymphony.com:8668/space/WebWork)? The current WW docs don't really say anything substantive along this line. Thanks for the info. -Bill Matt Ho wrote: snip/ Here's an email I recently sent to a friend that

Re: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: [OS-webwork] OpenSymphony buildprocess

2002-12-17 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Patrick Lightbody wrote: If we don't include ant but instead tell people to download ant, I can promise you that the mavenites will be clamoring for maven builds instead, since downloading maven or downloading ant are parallels. Besides, build.xml is there, you can use ant just like you

Re: [OS-webwork] OpenSymphony build process

2002-12-17 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Bill Lynch wrote: Hani, I am vehemently opposed to build.bat and build.sh. All you need is ant. I'm likewise against checking in ant to every single project. It's a fairly reasonable assumption that people who might need to build a project have ant installed (you don't bundle gnu

Re: [OS-webwork] xbook

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Aslak Hellesøy wrote: xbook looks like something else. Yes. xdoc is a proprietary xml format invented by jakarta. it's kind of plain xhtml with some extra tags (section, source...) to mark sections ans source sections. details are here:

Re: [OS-webwork] xbook

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Burton
/tutorial.html#jsl? -Bill Aslak -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Burton Sent: 12. desember 2002 18:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] xbook Hello, Aslak Hellesøy wrote: xbook looks like something else. Yes

Re: [OS-webwork] Documentation

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote: Ken, snip/ Personally I'd vote for xdocs without Maven at the moment, that gives us a good upgrade path to Maven (if we decide to use it) or to any other XML based doc format (as xdocs are XML files already). Sure. However, why not check in the Maven

Re: [OS-webwork] Re: the names of the three new tags

2002-11-13 Thread Bill Burton
Hello, boxed wrote: How about just 'out' for print? To go along with out.println etc. Yes, as this aligns better with JSTL. The syntax of ww:out ... should probably be the same or a superset of c:out I know that out is the name in JSTL but I personally feel that this is an argument