So everyone can read this w/o download and install it - I've
(temporarily) deployed it to my demo server:
http://demo.raibledesigns.com/ww2tutorial
HTH,
Matt
On Mar 8, 2004, at 5:08 AM, Vítor Souza wrote:
Hi all,
As I mentioned in a previous message, I'm working on a WW2
Tut
in the next few months - I'll try to document it as best I can
when I do. From that - you should get a pretty good sample app.
Matt
On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:41 PM, Charlie Morss wrote:
Just to put my 2 cents in here. I'm a huge fan of WebWork and XWork
and I recently started a new pr
Vítor Souza wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting an error from Velocity when I try to use Webwork UI tags in
a VM template. If I write this (which was taken from
Using+WebWork+2+Tags+from+Velocity in the wiki) in the script:
#tag( TextField "label=Username" "name=username" )
This should be
#tag(
Eliot Sykes wrote:
Apologies if this isn't text only but Outlook or something else is
playing up.
I didn't raise the original question, but I do have a inkling of
interest in it's answer.
In Turbine, there is a concept of a screen. A screen is a combination
of one velocity template and one s
rname=matt
2. setUsername("matt") is called on our action
3. the execute() method of the action is called
4. velocity renders the result
5. in the velocity template, setuserpassword.vm, getUsername() is called
to render
dosetuserpassword.action?username=$username
into
dosetuser
and that might show you where your problems lie.
HTH,
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jens Riboe
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] tomcat ve
The only way that I've found do do this is using Commons HttpClient.
Matt
On Jan 28, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
I don't think you can redirect with a POST... Not sure...
-Original Message-
From: Leonidas Papadakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January
SourceForge's CVS has been hosed since last Friday. I've heard it'll be
fixed by this weekend. A nice week long outage. If I were you, I'd
wait until the issues are solved before messing with your repository.
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
> -Original M
Google it: http://www.google.com/search?q=spring+xwork
3rd item...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] example of using xwo
Rickard Öberg wrote:
Matt Ho wrote:
I've opted to move this to the webwork extensions rather than have it
part of the webwork core. Although the VelocityServlet will be
deprecated, that won't be til Velocity 1.5!
One of the features that's extremely appealing about the velocit
Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
There seem to be some problems with the Tags in the latest CVS checkout.
Specifically IncludeTag and UrlTag cause exceptions when used.
Is that a known problem?
Nope, but it's fixed in CVS now :)
M
---
This SF.net emai
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
Recent changes to webwork included the addition of some macros for backwards
compatibility. As part of this change, though, I'm seeing problems with
configuring other macros. I've been using a velocity.properties file that
includes declarations of 2 additional macro files. Th
Hani Suleiman wrote:
+1, the valuestack is a neat thing and all that, but having random
pushs/pops happen in UI tags of all things just feels wrong.
Agreed. However, I'm unclear why pushes and pops are required though.
#foreach( $number in $person.phoneNumbers )
$stack.push($number)
#bo
I've opted to move this to the webwork extensions rather than have it
part of the webwork core. Although the VelocityServlet will be
deprecated, that won't be til Velocity 1.5!
One of the features that's extremely appealing about the velocity tool
project is the ability to easily add your own
Fred Lamuette wrote:
I dont think two #param directives are a good idea.
What about a default behaviour defined in the webwork.properties ? With an
attribute in param tag to override the default, it would be nice.
This is now done in CVS. The param supports an optional eval attribute.
If eval i
Fred Lamuette wrote:
As far as I am concerned this approach is not the correct one ! I explain my
point of view with an example :
With the latest XWork+WW2 cvs snapshot, you can write a select tag both ways
:
1/
#tag(Select "name='nameValue'" ...) -> in this case, the parameter with
key=name and
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Open a jira issue for this, but I suspect it'll be a post 2.0 thing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Hall
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:05 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [OS-webwork] Parametized ta
Dick Zetterberg wrote:
Just out of curiosity, did you measure against the released version of 1.3 or the CVS
version?
Did you use JSP or Velocity for presentation?
Could you perhaps post your testcases here so that we may have a look at them and
perhaps try them ourselves?
I'd also be interested
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I couldn't find my previous email on the SF list yet to keep this reply
there, but I believe I understand now why the velocity directives act the
way they do. In my post, I indicated that it would be easier to pass objects
from the velocity context into bodytag params if you
Eric Pugh wrote:
Okay, so there isn't anything "Out of the box" or "WebWork way" for doing
this.. I guess what I am learning about WebWork is that it isn't the
"garbage can" approach to providing everything.. I have used Turbine
extensively, and in Turbe there are built in tools to for generating
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
Any pointer of how a solution could be done would be greatly appreciated
. I will of course submit my changes to JIRA (if the solution is nice
enough) so others may download and try it out. Unfortunately there are a
couple of properties in the VelocityLayoutServlet that ar
Dag Liodden wrote:
Juhu! :) It DOES work. :) I was using the latest, unstable build of
CeWolf - works like a charm with 0.9.8. I'll update the Wiki with this.
awesome :)
M
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
D
,
Dag
Matt Ho wrote:
Dag Liodden wrote:
I'm trying to get the CeWolf taglib to work with WW/Velocity.
However, findAncestorWithClass() fails with a null response. Does the
#bodytag-directive support this and/or am I doing something wrong?
Here's my template:
$req.setAttribute("dat
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
Hi Matt, Patric and all others!
I've been using a special VelocityResult and WebWorkVelocityServlet
(JIRA WW-288 (LARGE hack!)) in WW2 that is an extension of the
VelocityLayoutServlet in Velocity Tools. Those files depended a lot on
the old implementation of how the
Dag Liodden wrote:
I'm trying to get the CeWolf taglib to work with WW/Velocity. However,
findAncestorWithClass() fails with a null response. Does the
#bodytag-directive support this and/or am I doing something wrong?
Here's my template:
$req.setAttribute("dataset", $dataset)
#bodytag(SimpleCh
John Patterson wrote:
I notice that in previous discussions on this list, people talk a lot
about using ServletFilters to open a Session and ensure it is closed.
Is there any problem with using an interceptor to do this?
The main issue with using an interceptor is handling chaining. Consider
t
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
this is great, being able to use any jsp tag in velocity but could you
make an example of using a Jsp tag library in velocity?
Sure. I added an example to the webwork-example that illustrates using
the displaytag.org libraries to generate a table. To summarize what w
Dag Liodden wrote:
Yup, and it's easy too! :) I ported the standard templates to support
the tigris style-project (http://style.tigris.org/) in an hour or so.
Works perfectly (well, worked before the latest refactorings) and
looks good.
I suppose this would be interesting to some of you, so if
parameter,
person.name = "Matt"
then the parameter interceptor would automatically instantiate the
Person object (assuming Person has a default constructor) and then
populate the name field with Matt. Previously, you had to create the
Person object yo
Robert Douglass wrote:
Hi all. I'm using Velocity with WW2 for the first time, and it's not going
groovy for me. With the following radio tag, I am getting an OGNL exception
because getLanguage gets called, and it throws and error because getLanguage
is dependent on setLanguage being called first.
Dag Liodden wrote:
Figures. :) I've noticed and appreciated the checkins. The recent
changes has removed the previous error, but introduced a
NullPointerException in VelocityResult instead.
Line 61: PageContext pageContext = jspFactory.getPageContext(servlet,
request, response, null, true, 819
Robert Douglass wrote:
Hi all. If anyone can explain to me how to use the #tag(Select ...) without
having to make my own inner-class Node implementations, I will update the
Wiki with clear examples and a thorough and clear text. Don't do it for me.
Do it for the next guy who downloads WW2 and asks
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Yup, CVS is broken for calling tags from velocity. We’re working on it.
It's unbroke now.
M
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Mensagem original-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It should be possible once we get the velocity tags all set up.
Any idea how long could this take? I'm *really* missing the velocity
tags here (to the point i have to actually write documentat
As Pat mentioned the upcoming beta2 release is gonna have a bunch of UI
changes. Here's are some additional changes going into the mix:
* Support for $ui in Velocity will be removed
* The Renderer and RendererIteration classes used by Velocity have been
removed. Instead, velocity will treat t
Jason Carreira wrote:
Matt,
How do we get to the webwork-extensions module you created?
Oops. It looks like it's still pending approval? (after 7 weeks?)
I'll poke the java.net guys about pushing this through.
M
---
This SF
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
why do you use that OgnlList instead of just ArrayList?
Ognl doesn't (currently) instantiate new objects when users submit info.
OgnlList fills in this blank by instantiating objects of the specified
instance.
So, without OgnlList, that[0] would always resolve to null
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Just to clear up any confusion -- Avalon nor Pico nor Spring will be
included in WebWork. All of these may or may not be added to the very
new (nothing in CVS, or very little) webwork-extensions project.
Pico's already in there. I'll look toward adding others later.
M
I'm clearer now on what you're looking to do. If
that[0].Cheetah.name
that[1].Monkey.name
works, then ModelDriven should work just fine.
Having said that, the following code snippet should work for you
(haven't tested it though). This is slightly different than what you
asked for in that what
I'm clearer now on what you're looking to do. If
that[0].Cheetah.name
that[1].Monkey.name
works, then ModelDriven should work just fine.
Having said that, the following code snippet should work for you
(haven't tested it though). This is slightly different than what you
asked for in that what
Samuel Mota wrote:
Hi,
How can I use the Session and Application maps within velocity?
$req.session.getAttribute(...)
$req.session.servletContext.getAttribute(...)
M
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.
I'm not sure exactly of the problem you're having. However, there's a
write up on model driven on
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Xwork+Interceptors
To summarize, declaring something as ModelDriven just puts it on the top
of the value stack so when your parameters get resolved, the model g
Fred Lamuette wrote:
I'm using almost the same pattern as you, I've created an interceptor that
loads the model in the action
(detection of the id paramter and extension of the ModelDriven interface to
add setModel(..) and getModelClass() method, thus I can load and store
easily my entity in my Mod
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Ho
Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Does this module exist at java.net or sf ?
All code for xwork/webwork resides in java.net :)
Jason or Patrick, can
Cameron Braid wrote:
Does this module exist at java.net or sf ?
All code for xwork/webwork resides in java.net :)
Jason or Patrick, can you put a readme file in the sf.net repository to
this effect? I recently rebuilt my machine and forgot to save my ssh
keys (doh).
M
-
#foreach( $email in $emails )
#tag( TextField "label='E-Mail'" "name=emails[$velocityCount].address" )
#end
assuming velocityCount is configured to start @ 0 and that address is a
List of OgnlList type (see previous email)
You might want to check the jsp though as I think this might end up
overw
Try this. This should work.
class MyAction ... {
private List emails = new OgnlList();
public List getEmails() { return this.emails ; }
...
}
class OgnlList extends ArrayList {
private Class clazz;
public OgnlList(Class clazz) {
this
Put it into webwork-optional module of the webwork repository.
M
Cameron Braid wrote:
I don't mind where it goes.
I can remove the CoolUriServletDispatcher if you want.
Should we setup a WebWork2-extensions project on java.net ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Pat Lightbody wrote:
There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which
all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some
want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am
leaning towards this:
* UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc
Cameron,
Go ahead and check this in.
M
Cameron Braid wrote:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map g
<%
OgnlValueStack stack = ActionContext.getContext().getStack();
%>
M
Adam Fleming wrote:
I give up trying to work nicely with the ww:tags and OGNL (Thanks for
your help though, Matt Ho :)
How can I get the Value Stack within the jsp?
I suspect somethin
If you're trying to toString() [EMAIL PROTECTED], then call
A value stack is essentially a List. Calling [1] on the stack, returns
a substack beginning with the element at index 1. It's only when you
call methods on the stack that your actual objects will be called.
Said another way, let's
Currently, no. However, this is definitely a good suggestion. Although
XW/WW supports IoC, it doesn't use it internally. I think once we get
2.0 squared away, we should definintely look at having XW/WW using IoC
internally, which would include using it to create interceptors.
M
Anoop Rangan
You actually will need to set up all 3 lifecycle handlers even if your
app only uses application context objects.
container
com.opensymphony.webwork.lifecycle.RequestLifecycleFilter
container
/*
com.opensymphony.webwork.lifecycle.SessionLifecycleListener
M
Samuel Mota wrote:
Hi,
I'
Jason Carreira wrote:
I believe the change Matt made to the TokenInterceptor to make the
validToken() method return what the Javadoc said it should will make
this possible (this is in CVS HEAD). I think :-)
I still need to go in and fix the TokenInterceptorTest to pass (bad Matt
;-)) so don't
Hendrik van der Linde wrote:
I am currently trying to pass the value of an iterator to an action.
This is what it should look like (sort of):
How do I get the value of the current top stack value passed to the edit
action? Thi
Cameron Braid wrote:
One problem that comes to mind with this approach is that if someone
'hacks' the request, specifying parameters that aren't meant to be
coming in.
i.e - using your example
Public class CreateInvoiceAction extends ActionSupport {
private Invoice invoice = new Invoice();
Velocity support for URL and bean and should be in CVS by the weekend.
Velocity already supports Action.
M
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
Yes, present as in existing classes in c.o.w.views.jsp, but they are not
working from Velocity.
A tag directive like
#tag (URL "value=/d/a.action")
results in an ex
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
Great!
Now I have some questions :-)
What IF the velocity template is accessed directly, how can one know, in
the template, if this is happening?
Do you mean how can one tell the difference between:
#parse( "/my/template.vm" )
and
#tag( Component "template=/my/templat
With regards to the data contained within the ValueStack, I've posted
the following up on the wiki under:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Using+WebWork+2+Tags+from+Velocity
cWebWork2 contains the following items by default in the ValueStack:
* req - the current HttpServletRequest
* r
Ok, after looking through the code. It looks like when the
AbstractClosingUITag was added, no corresponding support was built into
velocity. This was also the case for the TokenTag. I've added support
to both in CVS and added a showVelocityForm.action to the list of
snippets on the front pag
I've added this to jira as WW-277. This should be resolved in CVS.
M
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
found a bug in checkboxlist.vm
if a List (of selected checkboxes) is passed to the value attribute in
the tag it wont select those checkboxes.
this:
$!{itemKey}
should be changed to this:
I'd love check out the code for this. This sounds like a really good thing
to include as an optional package for webwork.
M
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:34:43 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been working with Philipp Meier's WW2 Client dispatcher and have
enhanced it to include thing
Ignore this email. My mail reader is doing weird things :(
M
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:53:30 -0700, Matt Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:17:54 -0700, Brett Knights <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In the discussion so far there are two examples of things I need to
that
it's impossible to argue one way or the other. Smart people will argue
for one side or the other till they turn blue, and no solid facts will
ever be made.
With that said, I'm making an executive decision (Matt and Jason, back me
up here ;): just as we provided a simple valid
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:56:21 +0100, John Patterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking into using Webwork for an upcoming web project. In the past
I have used Struts with the Tiles extension which I really liked for its
page layout abilities. It seems that with Webwork most people are usi
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:17:54 -0700, Brett Knights <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In the discussion so far there are two examples of things I need to do to
in
my business code that are mandated by the environment. Neither of these
is
in any way related to the business rules implemented by my model cl
There's a search box in the top left corner.
HTH,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] how to search this mailing list?
I've been trying to find out how
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 08:03:52 -0700, Pat Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Matt and I were talking about releasing initial alphas maybe this week?
Matt, does that sound about right?
I'd like to plan on releasing it this weekend. That'll give me some time
to write a getting s
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:25:01 -0700, Brett Knights <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
dependencies on their framework. This is a good thing. This often
translates
to people wanting to write objects that don't know they will be used in a
framework. This seems impossible if you actually want your objects to
I just came across this today. His version of IoC has some really good
point.
http://www.springframework.org/docs/lightweight_container.html
thoughts?
M
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing
BOGAERT Mathias wrote:
This works fine as long as you do not have any child objects that need to be
created.
Yeah, I agree this is a problem for now. Hopefully, this will be fixed
in the near future. The workaround I usually use is:
public Foo getFoo() {
if( this.foo == null ) {
this.
-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 8 juli 2003 19:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Model Driven Actions
BOGAERT Mathias wrote:
Also, currently our tag libraries don't support getting and setting
business objects, only identifiers. So you still have to tran
s doing this?
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 8 juli 2003 18:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Model Driven Actions
I've updated the wiki to include docs on ModelDriven and the
ModelDrivenInterceptor.
http://wiki.opensy
d, and then in doExecute I manually do a lookup for the company and
assign it to the customer object.
How are you guys doing this?
Mathias
-----Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 8 juli 2003 18:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Model Drive
omize the order
of interceptors so that you can (and this is the example Matt had that
led to us talking this through) set your static params (the params from
your xwork.xml) then the action can use these params to decide which
model type to build when getModel is called to get the model to put int
Whoops ... this was intended as a personal message.
M
Matt Ho wrote:
Scott,
Thanks for all the work that you guys put in getting things put back
together. I wanted to see if you guys needed a hand with any of the
administration stuff. Also, I was interested in setting up cruise
control
Scott,
Thanks for all the work that you guys put in getting things put back
together. I wanted to see if you guys needed a hand with any of the
administration stuff. Also, I was interested in setting up cruise
control, but I heard that you were looking at that as well. I'd be
interested in
Brett Knights wrote:
I don't know if this helps but I used to get similar problems with Tomcat.
One of the items I was putting into the session wasn't Serializable. I fixed
that (just implemented the Serializable interface) and I haven't seen any
problems since on context reloading.
Yep. That's se
t a fix in CVS for this evening and make sure to include Tomcat as
part of the build process.
M
Bjorn A wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 23:27:40 -0700, Matt Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anthony Eden wrote:
I just pulled down the current WebWork2 code from the CVS and have a
couple of observ
Matthew E.Porter wrote:
I am in the process of converting JLCP from some other, unnamed
framework (cough... cough.. Struts) to Webwork2 and would like to
solicit some feedback from those who using Webwork2/XWork. Right now, I
am working on our Poll Module and see two possible roads to take fo
Anthony Eden wrote:
I just pulled down the current WebWork2 code from the CVS and have a
couple of observations:
Whoops! Some of these were my fault. Thanks for catching them.
I've gone ahead and fixed all the issues on your list that I could
reproduce and updated associated the unit test. Th
The existing avalon style IoC as well as the $ui based velocity tags
should be considered deprecated. Unless there are objections, I'm going
to remove them at the end of this month and either get rid of them or
migrate them to another package if people express enough interest in
keeping them a
Ugh ... I hates when that happens.
M
Scott Farquhar wrote:
Matt,
We've had the hard drive crash for the second time in 2 weeks on one of
our boxes (the one hosting all open source jira projects, and javablogs).
We're upgrading to a RAID box now, but it will take a little while
Looks like Jira is down. I'm just getting "Test Page"
M
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
Most of those requested additional attributes like onchange, onblur etc
have been added in WW-221 as well as the TLD generation with xdoclet.
See Jira for details.
cheers,
Rainer
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Thursday, J
Ara brought up a really good point about the existing ui tags. There's
really no mechanism to pass along additional presentation information
such as onChange for HTML views or fetchhint for VoiceXML views. The
param tag is available, but that seems a little heavy for this. It
strikes me this
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Apologies for my Australian-ism - but your subclass structure is bullshit :)
Hahaha. Ok, I'll just keep it to myself then :)
Why do that? It's far too complex. Just have doCreate(), doRead() etc and
use the code as is. This is exactly what it was designed for?
This wher
> Well, there are tonnes of use cases for this (you are talking about
> commands right?)
>
> The most commonly quoted one is a CRUD action. You create different
> methods like doCreate(), doUpdate() and have the same fields (ie name,
> email etc).
Ha! I've definitely spent too much time with Strut
, here I come!
The ModelDrivenInterceptor could access the ActionContext to
get params and become totally independent of ordering. Just
thought of that..
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS
I think what would be really useful for the discussion are some concrete
examples of pojos that would make use of multiple entry points.
Certainly the workflow we've been talking about is one example, but I'd
like to understand what some others are.
M
Jason Carreira wrote:
Amen brother!
> If you DO want it, use ActionSupport - which subclasses the above and
> provides a doValidation, doDefault, doExecute cycle.
>
> It _also_ provides backward compatibility (damn I sound like Hani
> here!) which is a good thing as there is no real need to break it
> unnecessarily?
>
> I maintain th
This causes another ModelDriven problem. If the
StaticParameterInterceptor comes after the ParametersInterceptor, then
how can the proposed ModelDrivenInterceptor utilize static config
information?
M
Jason Carreira wrote:
If you set up your interceptors to have the StaticParameterInterceptor
I agree with you on this. A good solution to this would be to allow
Actions to implement Parameterizable. Actions marked as parameterizable
would have the static params set via the this interface as well as
through mechanism. You'd know that any params that were set via the
Parameterizable i
Yeah, we're definitely lacking on the docs. My schedule will be freeing
up in two weeks so I'll be able to put more effort into that.
M
boxed wrote:
I have tried migrating my quite large app to WW2, these are my issues with
it:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2+Migration+Guide specif
+1. This type of behavior should be pluggable.
M
Jason Carreira wrote:
While we're bringing up controversial topics
A while back Mike refactored ActionSupport to have a parent class,
BaseActionSupport, that does most of the work, and put the old workflow
stuff into ActionSupport:
public
I made this argument before and I think it still stands. I may not like
Struts, but I can pick up any piece of struts code and look for the
execute (or perform for older stuts code) method and know that's a
starting point.
Without the Action interface, I'm forced to wander through the code
tr
Pat Lightbody wrote:
While I'm not sure that the ActionProxy stuff is heading in that direction,
believe me when I say I also don't think that getting rid of interfaces is a
great thing. Pico is doing that (it calls start() and stop() using
reflection rather than Startable and Stopable). Likewise
If you pass false as the last argument to createActionProxy, it won't
call the Result so you can save yourself to MockResult :)
M
Ara Abrahamian wrote:
public void testSuccessfulLogin() throws Exception {
parameters.put("username", new String[]{"savaki"});
parameters.put("password", new Stri
03 7:51 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] pico support available
How are the Actions instantiated? Before, it was doing newInstance()
from the class in the DefaultActionInvocation... I assume you replace
the ActionProxyFactory in the lifecycle listener?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mai
ginal Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] pico support available
i've added pico support to xwork and webwork. i've also updated the
sample application in webwork to use pico.
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
