Re: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork internals refactoring

2004-02-24 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Mate, Great email - thoughts below: > Several people have been asking about replacing the clazz.newInstance() calls > in XWork with object factories which can be replaced, to allow integration > with Spring/Pico/etc... While I'm all for this, I think there are some issues > that need to be thoug

Re: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork internals refactoring

2004-02-24 Thread Rickard Öberg
Jason Carreira wrote: One question I had about these frameworks... Is it possible for me to define a default configuration, and allow the users of the framework to just selectively replace individual components, or would they have to reconfigure the whole thing? Thoughts? Ideas? One design tha

RE: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork internals refactoring

2004-02-23 Thread Drew McAuliffe
ch out parts and replace them with what they need, but more than that is probably unnecessary and undesirable. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason CarreiraSent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork int

[OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork internals refactoring

2004-02-23 Thread Jason Carreira
Title: Message Several people have been asking about replacing the clazz.newInstance() calls in XWork with object factories which can be replaced, to allow integration with Spring/Pico/etc... While I'm all for this, I think there are some issues that need to be thought through so we can get