Frank
- Original Message -
From: "James Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] CommandDriven SUCCESS
> > I'm getting pretty good at this XDoclet stuff, I can probalby
> > write
> I'm getting pretty good at this XDoclet stuff, I can probalby
> write a template to generate the actions.xml file if need be.
What does your xdoclet tags look like. I didn't think that XDoclet supported
command driven actions yet. Jason had a good proposal a few weeks ago:
http://sf.net/mailarc
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Frank FebbraroSent: 04 April 2003 00:37To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
CommandDriven SUCCESS
If there is a better way to handle this in
general, I'm all ears too.
I'm getting pretty good at this XDoclet
stuff, I
one,
Frank
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:52
PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] CommandDriven
SUCCESS
Ok,
who knows the views.properties way of doing this?
It
looks to me like the "
Title: Message
Ok,
who knows the views.properties way of doing this?
It
looks to me like the "." in the action name is giving problems.
-Original Message-From: Frank Febbraro
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003
5:42 PMTo: webworkSubject: [OS-webwork
> -Original Message-
> From: Philipp Meier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> CommandDriven isn't just implemented by ActionSupport, the
> ServletDispatcher must support it too. Otherwise it could not
> handle the ! part in the Action name.
>
Point taken. It was even more of a hack :-)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:46:14PM -0800, Jason Carreira wrote:
> The idea for Xwork is to make this a core part of the framework, so it's
> not implemented only in ActionSupport, and to make it done by the
> ActionInvocation, rather than inside the execute() base method. In this
> way, you don't h
> Google for "command pattern" instead.
Command Driven Pattern != Command Pattern
--
Matt Ho
Principal
Indigo Egg, Inc.
http://www.indigoegg.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive
Google for "command pattern" instead.
-Bill
Matt Ho wrote:
Could you concisely explain what you mean by CommandDriven? A google
search on ("command driven" pattern) returns only 1,500 non-topical
entries. I have a working definition based on the existing code and
your comments, but a more conc
CommandDriven is an interface in WW 1.x and is implemented in
ActionSupport. Basically, if you set a parameter into the Action named
command, either through the configuration, as a form or URL parameter,
or by creating a URL like http://localhost/action!commandName, then the
implementation in Actio
10 matches
Mail list logo
