Title: Re: [OS-webwork] Suggestion for a change in UI Component Tag
Why would you want to do that? All WW tags should be AbstractWrappingTags (as they are now) - because they can all take parameters via the param tag?
Mike
On 29/5/03 7:28 PM, "Cameron Braid" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
taa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Matt Ho
> Sent: Friday, 30 May 2003 1:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Suggestion for a change in UI Component Tag
>
>
> Cameron Braid
Cameron Braid wrote:
> on second thoughts.. there was something confusing happening.. the TLD
> for the component tag declares that its contents MUST be empty :(
>
> Please change it to JSP and all is well :)
All is well :)
M
---
This SF.net e
-198
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cameron BraidSent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 9:56 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [OS-webwork]
Suggestion for a change in UI Component Tag
you can all
ignore my ignorance... I have
Title: Message
you can all
ignore my ignorance... I have just discovered that the Component tag is
parameterizable !!
Thanks
:)
..Cam..
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cameron BraidSent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 7:29 PMT
