or
Anyone who can help, feel free to chip in :)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 December 2003 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
Umm.. Probably on the Xwork Interceptors page... If you want to start it,
Oops... That last one should be Interceptor-stack A after
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Carreira
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
>
>
> Action chaining works like this:
Message-
> From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
>
>
> That chains them, but it is not the behavior I am looking for.
> Ideally, if i h
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
>
>
> Having spent some time wrestling with this myself, this sort
> of info would be nice to be added to the Wiki somewhere :)
> What's the best place for it and i'll add it ?
>
> ---
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
Oops... That last one should be Interceptor-stack A after
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Carreira
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action ch
That chains them, but it is not the behavior I am looking for.
Ideally, if i had action A interceptor-stack A and action B with
interceptor-stack B, this would happen
interceptor-stack A before
action A
interceptor-stack A after
interceptor-stack B before
action B
interceptor-s
