esending it again, but
> this time in two parts.
>
> Is it possible to raise a limit on mail message size?
>
> Stjepan
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Stjepan Gros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM
> Subject:
* Stjepan Gros [11. Nov 2008]:
> Ok, attached are the remaining patches to remove warnings caused by
> 32/64 bit conversions. I removed all the other changes which I'm going
> to send later and I'm not going to split it across subsystems because
> it causes me more work to have. Hope it's not the p
[Sunday 09 November 2008 - 15:09:35] "Stjepan Gros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached is patch for openvas-client only. If this is OK, then I'll send
> patches for other subsystems as well.
FYI: I have just committed your patch to the SVN repository with revision
1688. Thanks!
Regards,
Michael
-
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stjepan Gros wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, actually I do. What about those patches to move plugins into
separate subdirectory?
>>> Didn't take a
[Sunday 09 November 2008 - 15:09:35] "Stjepan Gros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I added ChangeLog entry. Also, I removed few non-64bit related changes
> whose sole purpose was to get rid of some additional warnings. I'm going to
> send those later, when this is applied, because it becomes hard for me to
Stjepan Gros wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Well, actually I do. What about those patches to move plugins into
>>> separate subdirectory?
>> Didn't take a deeper look at the patch. I'm concerned about issue I see;
>> I'm not sure how inclu
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, actually I do. What about those patches to move plugins into
>> separate subdirectory?
>
> Didn't take a deeper look at the patch. I'm concerned about issue I see;
> I'm not sure how include files will be handled
> Well, actually I do. What about those patches to move plugins into
> separate subdirectory?
Didn't take a deeper look at the patch. I'm concerned about issue I see;
I'm not sure how include files will be handled?
Kost
___
Openvas-devel mailing list
Op
On Sonntag, 9. November 2008, Stjepan Gros wrote:
> What about those patches to move plugins into separate
> subdirectory?
unfortunately we can't fork just like openvasd can ;-)
Your patch promises a very, very important feature
and will definitely be reviewed soon.
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Ja
Hi,
I saw this mail just a few days ago but was unable to respond sooner because
I'm busy lately with my everyday job. Comments are below.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Michael Wiegand <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Thursday 16 October 2008 - 19:04:55] "Stjepan Gros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
[Thursday 16 October 2008 - 19:04:55] "Stjepan Gros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I went throught the code and included GLib in those subsystems that
> didn't use it yet. I then inserted GPOINTER_TO_SIZE instead of (int) and
> GSIZE_TO_POINTER instead of (void *). Furthermore, every occurence of
> si
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 20:54:03 Stjepan Gros wrote:
> I can not promise that I'll do much so I'll not create svn account for now.
> Still, as I would like to use openvas on my laptop I'll try to clean a bit
> the code.
Not a problem, even little patches can help.
> Attached is a small patc
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:24:35 Stjepan Gros wrote:
>
> > Is anyone working on this?
>
> Nope, not on that specific bug. OpenVAS is doubtless buggy on AMD64 though
> (as was Nessus). I've seen at least one issue so far
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:24:35 Stjepan Gros wrote:
> Is anyone working on this?
Nope, not on that specific bug. OpenVAS is doubtless buggy on AMD64 though
(as was Nessus). I've seen at least one issue so far - bug #639 - in
relation to signedness extension, but there are doubtless othe
Hi!
I don't know if anyone already brought this to the mailing list, but I think
it's important.
While trying to compile trunk version of openvas-libraries on 64-bit fedora
the compiler gets a bunch of the following style warnings:
plugutils.c: In function 'plug_set_id':
plugutils.c:233: warning
15 matches
Mail list logo
