Re: [Openvpn-devel] RE: [Openvpn-users] Windows tun driver

2003-09-17 Thread James Yonan
Matthias Andree said: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote: > > > While I do believe that the majority of Windows users will prefer a tap > > interface, I say this simply because in my experience _most_ Windows users > > prefer the option that is the easiest to configure. Once you stop > >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] RE: [Openvpn-users] Windows tun driver

2003-09-17 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, James Yonan wrote: > While I do believe that the majority of Windows users will prefer a tap > interface, I say this simply because in my experience _most_ Windows users > prefer the option that is the easiest to configure. Once you stop > automatically routing broadcasts and

[Openvpn-devel] Beta naming convention?

2003-09-17 Thread John Conneely
Hi James! First, thanks for such a great product! I've been using openvpn-1.3.2 on a few Mandrake boxes for a little under a year now, and it's been bulletproof. Now I'd like to try out windows support, so I thought I'd upgrade to your latest beta. (I'm not sure if that's necessary on my linux

[Openvpn-devel] TAP driver stalls on Linux

2003-09-17 Thread James Yonan
I'm testing a new version of OpenVPN which has the ability to lower the MSS on TCP SYN packets as they pass through a tun or tap tunnel, similar to the existing iptables capability. I am testing by running FTP transfers over the tunnel. I am finding that everything works perfectly over tun tunnel