Ralph,
I think you're right and I think it may cost to get the driver signed
(which is an unreasonable request to make of James, before anyone makes
it, given the amount of time he's already given for free to the
project). Worse still, I have the unfortunate feeling that it may cost
to resig
Am Mittwoch 15 September 2004 04:03 schrieb James Yonan:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Russell Sutherland wrote:
> > When one installs the current OpenVPN .exe NSIS install
> > bundle on a WindowsXP or 2000 machine, a window pops
> > up during the installation process saying something
> > to the effect:
>
hello list,
here's a patch to add basic ntlm support to openvpn 1.6.0
i've tested it with i386 linux & win32 against MS ISA proxy.
it includes base64 code from heimdal...
- hope it's useful to somebody.
William--- openvpn/base64.c Thu Sep 2 17:00:25 2004
+++ openvpn-1.6.0/base64.c Thu Sep 2
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Didier CONCHAUDRON wrote:
But the main problem will be that OpenVPN will probably have to provide
commercial support or anything like that. Is openvpn ready for that?
I don't think it's James, or the community that should support a
commersial vendor. If someone buys a lic
I all,
I've not yet submit any patches for Openvpn but I would like to write a
little as I will surely provide a patch in few days/weeks.
I totally agree with your vision James. Openvpn main aim is to provide a
free/libre alternative to proprietry SSL VPN. I think the main aim is not
to make of O
