open...@rkmorris.us wrote:
Hi,
This is more my bet, because my question wasn't very clear ... I
require a proxy server during "normal" operation, but for this data
throughput test I had no proxy server, rather a "direct" connection.
without config files it's impossible to tell - is
> because i really believe in open source software I've decided to check
> all sorts of configurations to check problems with tcp tunneling.
This makes it sound like OpenVPN's performance is lower than some
comparable non-Free software.
Have you actually compared OpenVPN's performance to some
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:52:53AM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > open() first will exclusively lock it for you...
>
> From OpenBSD's tun(4) man page:
>
> Each device has the exclusive open property; it cannot be
> opened if it is
> already open and in use by another
On 03/05/2010 10:39:26 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:44:28AM +0100, Heiko Hund wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2010 10:11:51 Gert Doering wrote:
> > > What happened exactly? Could you ask your colleague for a log
> file?
> >
> > Well, he couldn't ping any remote
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:44:28AM +0100, Heiko Hund wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 10:11:51 Gert Doering wrote:
> > What happened exactly? Could you ask your colleague for a log file?
>
> Well, he couldn't ping any remote host. Nothing special in the log, really.
> If
> it isn't
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:42 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:21:43PM -0600, open...@rkmorris.us wrote:
> > > I did this in the client configuration file ... is this right?
> > > I checked the
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:21:43PM -0600, open...@rkmorris.us wrote:
> > I did this in the client configuration file ... is this right?
> > I checked the OpenVPN web site, and it may be that I need this on
> > the server side
Hi,
OK, I tried this (on both ends!), but no joy unfortunately ... :-( It almost
seemed like overall data throughput was lower, but the throughput results
bounce around so much that it's hard to really conclude this or not.
I'm not sure if attachments make it through to this mailing list
Hi,
Here's the summary of the previous community meeting.
---
COMMUNITY MEETING
Place: #openvpn-discussion on irc.freenode.net
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, 4th March 2010
Time: 18:00 UTC
Planned meeting topics for this meeting were on this page:
Hi Gert,
On Friday 05 March 2010 10:11:51 Gert Doering wrote:
> What happened exactly? Could you ask your colleague for a log file?
Well, he couldn't ping any remote host. Nothing special in the log, really. If
it isn't misleading it's quite obvious that the ordering is wrong:
TUN/TAP
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:42:23AM +0100, Heiko Hund wrote:
> On Sunday 28 February 2010 15:50:01 Gert Doering wrote:
> > Now, for all operatings systems *except* Win32 and OpenBSD, the sequence
> > of execution is
> >
> > open_tun()
> > do_ifconfig()
>
> That seems to make sense for
Hi Gert,
On Sunday 28 February 2010 15:50:01 Gert Doering wrote:
> Now, for all operatings systems *except* Win32 and OpenBSD, the sequence
> of execution is
>
> open_tun()
> do_ifconfig()
That seems to make sense for OpenBSD. I just had a colleague (kudos Moritz)
try to connect with
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:21:43PM -0600, open...@rkmorris.us wrote:
> I did this in the client configuration file ... is this right?
> I checked the OpenVPN web site, and it may be that I need this on
> the server side instead. Please clarify and I'll try it again (if
> I need to).
13 matches
Mail list logo
