Hi,
Thanks for the updates.
In spite of several nits below, I'm ACKing this.
All remarks are typos or grammar, important only for docs
and some comments. I suggest to handle these as a minor follow
up patch.
I'm also ignoring most typos in commit message except a few that
could be corrected dur
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:34 AM Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Before OpenSSL 1.1.1 there could be no mismatch between
> compiled and actual OpenSSL version. With OpenSSL 1.1.1 we need
> runtime detection to detect the actual best TLS version supported.
>
> Allowing this runtime detection also allows
Tiny grammar concern:
On 22/11/2019 14:33, Arne Schwabe wrote:
For TLS 1.0 to 1.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.0 calls us and requires a PKCS1
padded response. As TLS 1.3 mandates RSA-PSS padding support and also
requires an TLS 1.3 implementation to support RSA-PSS for older TLS
version, OpenSSL will query
Before OpenSSL 1.1.1 there could be no mismatch between
compiled and actual OpenSSL version. With OpenSSL 1.1.1 we need
runtime detection to detect the actual best TLS version supported.
Allowing this runtime detection also allows removing some of the
TLS 1.3/OpenSSL 1.1.1 #ifdefs
Without this pa
For TLS 1.0 to 1.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.0 calls us and requires a PKCS1
padded response. As TLS 1.3 mandates RSA-PSS padding support and also
requires an TLS 1.3 implementation to support RSA-PSS for older TLS
version, OpenSSL will query us to sign an already RSA-PSS padded
string.
This patch adds an '