Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL 1.1.x branch

2012-02-28 Thread Adriaan de Jong
to:fab...@lettink.de] On Behalf Of Fabian > Knittel > Sent: dinsdag 28 februari 2012 8:40 > To: Igor Novgorodov > Cc: Adriaan de Jong; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL > 1.1.x branch > > Hi Igor, >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL 1.1.x branch

2012-02-28 Thread Fabian Knittel
Hi Igor, 2012/2/28 Igor Novgorodov : > On 28.02.2012 1:37, Fabian Knittel wrote: >> Your patch removes the code that causes havege_init() to only be >> called once. You never want to initialise your PRNG more than once, >> otherwise you increase the risk that your randomness is

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL 1.1.x branch

2012-02-28 Thread Igor Novgorodov
On 28.02.2012 1:37, Fabian Knittel wrote: Hi Igor, 2012/2/27 Igor Novgorodov: The attached patch adds checking for PolarSSL version on crypto_polarssl.c and depending on which version we are using (1.0.x or 1.1.x) chooses a new shiny havege_random() function, or an old ugly

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL 1.1.x branch

2012-02-27 Thread Fabian Knittel
Hi Igor, 2012/2/27 Igor Novgorodov : > The attached patch adds checking for PolarSSL version on crypto_polarssl.c > and depending on which version we are using (1.0.x or 1.1.x) chooses a new > shiny havege_random() function, or an old ugly while{} loop hack to generate >

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 01/02] Add support for PolarSSL 1.1.x branch

2012-02-27 Thread Igor Novgorodov
Continuing to struggle with making OpenVPN as tiny as possible :) The attached patch adds checking for PolarSSL version on crypto_polarssl.c and depending on which version we are using (1.0.x or 1.1.x) chooses a new shiny havege_random() function, or an old ugly while{} loop hack to generate