Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Require at least 100MB of mlock()-able memory if --mlock is used.

HI, On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:12:04PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote: > prlimit on Linux is handy as it can change the limits of a running process > as well. Yes :-) - my week is full of exciting discoveries. > On FreeBSD probably "limits -P pid ... " can do the same? Indeed! Thanks, didn't follow t

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Require at least 100MB of mlock()-able memory if --mlock is used.

Hi, On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Gert Doering wrote: > Thanks, Selva. > > v3 has actually been buildbot-tested on all the platforms (I tested > v2 after the ACK, and it failed OpenSolaris, so I grumbled and adjusted > the #ifdef's...). It has been "tested for real" on Linux, which has > "pr

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH applied] Re: Require at least 100MB of mlock()-able memory if --mlock is used.

Thanks, Selva. v3 has actually been buildbot-tested on all the platforms (I tested v2 after the ACK, and it failed OpenSolaris, so I grumbled and adjusted the #ifdef's...). It has been "tested for real" on Linux, which has "prlimit" to tell you the currently-active limits for *other* processes -