Am 19.12.2016 um 11:01 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
>
> it seems, it depends on network-manager version.
> on fedora 23 I cannot import files, but on ubuntu I can.
Fedora 23 goes out of support these days (it's now more than 4 weeks
after Fedora 25 release), so it's time to upgrade...
Hi,
On 19 December 2016 at 14:48, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 19/12/16 10:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>>
>>> 1) what do you think of
On 19/12/16 11:01, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> I also wonder if this should be a GSoC project for network-manager,
> not OpenVPN...
>
>
> it might be anybody's project.
Well, that's true in some sense. But when it comes to the mentor side
of things this particular project needs to be tied
On 19/12/16 10:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>
>> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
>
> In general that is probably a good idea.
2016-12-19 14:41 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen :
> Hi,
>
> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>
>> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
>>
>
> In general that
Hi,
Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>
> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
In general that is probably a good idea. That said, we'd need somebody
to mentor the student, and
Hello,
I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
2) there are at least 2 ideas which I wished to be done with GSoC
2a) "import ovpn from URL for network-manager-openvpn" (actually, it is
perfect way to
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday June 5, j...@yonan.net wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's possible for the current TAP-Win32 driver to do OSI
> > Layer 3 with a network/netmask setting. This gets back to the same reason
> > why --ifconfig-pool-linear doesn't work on Windows:
> First, in this matter of a TAP driver for win 9x, i have to say
> that they aren't as dead as everyone might think. In countries that are
> in development or more poor, win 9x are the majority, The complications
> that come with winxp (bugs, worms, etc...) and the hardware that it
> requires are
On Sunday June 5, j...@yonan.net wrote:
>
> I don't think it's possible for the current TAP-Win32 driver to do OSI
> Layer 3 with a network/netmask setting. This gets back to the same reason
> why --ifconfig-pool-linear doesn't work on Windows: The TAP-Win32 driver
> is a TAP driver from the
es contest, see:
> >>
> >>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, I think we are late :(
> >
> > From: Chris DiBona <cdib...@google.com>
> > To: j...@yonan.net
> > Subject: Re: [M#27498536] [Openvpn-devel] Google sum
> > > The main change to the OpenVPN protocol is that when "ifconfig" is
> > > "pushed" to the client, it pushes an address and a subnetmask, instead
> > > of two addresses. (It already does this for dev==tap, so it isn't a
> > > big deal).
>
> This is my key point. The client needs to be told
tely, I think we are late :(
>
> From: Chris DiBona <cdib...@google.com>
> To: j...@yonan.net
> Subject: Re: [M#27498536] [Openvpn-devel] Google summer of code (fwd)
>
> Hi jim,
>
> You have a terrific project, but I'm sorry to say that we've already
> gon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>Google organizes contest, see:
>>
>>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> Hi,
> if I didn't have to write my thesis this summer, I'd love to participate.
Hi, I'm in the process of writing thesis too :)
> IMHO, TAP Support for Win95/98/Me
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel Lehmann:
> I think, a real tun driver for Windows is a killer feature. This would make
> large heterogenous VPN setups much easier, because you could provide your
> clients a layer-3 VPN without "losing" 2 addresses per client.
And in
On Saturday June 4, ov_de...@l3h.de wrote:
>
> I think, a real tun driver for Windows is a killer feature. This would make
> large heterogenous VPN setups much easier, because you could provide your
> clients a layer-3 VPN without "losing" 2 addresses per client.
>
A "real" tun driver (by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Google organizes contest, see:
http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
In short: It is about conntributions to known open source projects. 200
students could get $4500 each, $500 goes to mentor organization.
I think OpenVPN is mature enough
17 matches
Mail list logo