Hi,
in time for 2.3, one of the remaining open itches for the IPv6 code
is now fixed :-) (and the changes needed turned out to be fairly
trivial).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> the patch does not remove
>
> +++ b/push.c
> @@ -245,8 +245,9 @@ send_push_reply (struct context *c)
>/* TODO: push "/netbits" as well, to allow non-/64 subnet sizes
> * (needs changes in options.c, options.h, an
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:44:26 +0100
Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in time for 2.3, one of the remaining open itches for the IPv6 code
> is now fixed :-) (and the changes needed turned out to be fairly
> trivial).
Using ifconfig-ipv6-pool instead of server-ipv6(-macro) does not allow
non-/64 pre
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 04:49:51PM +0100, Marcel Pennewiß wrote:
> > in time for 2.3, one of the remaining open itches for the IPv6 code
> > is now fixed :-) (and the changes needed turned out to be fairly
> > trivial).
>
> Using ifconfig-ipv6-pool instead of server-ipv6(-macro) does not al
Am 20.01.13 19:50, schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 04:49:51PM +0100, Marcel Pennewiß wrote:
>>> in time for 2.3, one of the remaining open itches for the IPv6 code
>>> is now fixed :-) (and the changes needed turned out to be fairly
>>> trivial).
>> Using ifconfig-ipv6-poo
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:50:30PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> From cdfbc8952a01acde0eedf08fa0ebefed38fa2763 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Gert Doering
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:50:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Permit pool size of /64.../112 for ifconfig-ipv6-pool
>
> (Leftover check fro
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > the patch does not remove
> >
> > +++ b/push.c
> > @@ -245,8 +245,9 @@ send_push_reply (struct context *c)
> >/* TODO: push "/netbits" as well, to allow non-/64
On 03/02/12 18:12, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Michael wrote:
the patch does not remove
+++ b/push.c
@@ -245,8 +245,9 @@ send_push_reply (struct context *c)
/* TODO: push "/netbits" as
