Hi David,
David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/03/10 16:29, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
More tests, this time with 'oprofile' : here's a recap:
- nothing changed on the server side:
openvpn --ifconfig 10.222.0.1 10.222.0.2 --dev tun --secret secret.key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/03/10 16:29, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> More tests, this time with 'oprofile' : here's a recap:
> - nothing changed on the server side:
> openvpn --ifconfig 10.222.0.1 10.222.0.2 --dev tun --secret secret.key
> --cipher none
>
> - upgraded to
More tests, this time with 'oprofile' : here's a recap:
- nothing changed on the server side:
openvpn --ifconfig 10.222.0.1 10.222.0.2 --dev tun --secret secret.key --cipher
none
- upgraded to kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 on my laptop
- selinux is disabled
- installed the debuginfo rpms to
Hi all,
just ran a very silly test, all with openvpn 2.1.1, on my laptop running
FC12 (2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64) , Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
T9300 @ 2.50GHz, connected to a 100 Mbps LAN
server side:
openvpn --ifconfig 10.222.0.1 10.222.0.2 --dev tun --secret secret.key
--cipher
James Yonan wrote:
> all of the CPU-intensive cryptographic operations are being done in
> user space.
Could some kind of crypto acceleration of OpenSSL be in play?
//Peter
I believe this has been discussed before, but I noticed recently that a
Linux-based OpenVPN client (Linux 2.6.24, OpenVPN 2.1.1) spends a lot
more CPU time in kernel space than in user space. This is surprising,
given the fact that all of the CPU-intensive cryptographic operations
are being
