On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, James Yonan wrote:
> Well actually "Forking server support" is really a misnomer. It would
> be better titled "Server support for arbitrary number of connecting
> clients without requiring a separate config file and a
> pre-instantiated daemon for every client, or just "scala
Matthias Andree said:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, James Yonan wrote:
>
> > (1) Forking server support
> > (2) Automatic Secure MTU discovery
> > (3) IPv6 endpoints or IPv6 over tun device
> > (4) Windows port
> >
> > While none of these (with perhaps the exception of the last :) is
> > rocket scienc
On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, James Yonan wrote:
> (1) Forking server support
> (2) Automatic Secure MTU discovery
> (3) IPv6 endpoints or IPv6 over tun device
> (4) Windows port
>
> While none of these (with perhaps the exception of the last :) is
> rocket science, all require some work, and given that O
CURRENT STATUS
--
Here's an update on OpenVPN progress for the last two months...
1.3.1 appears to be very stable and there haven't been a lot of new patches
recently, though having said that there are certainly a few, most notably a
minor patch to enable NetBSD support, and better
