The wiki was a loss (my backup was only a symlink :-( ), but I've
re-written what I did to get this running.
Now available at:
http://teeks99.com/sys/OpenVPN-VMs/Tryout.html
Tom
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tom Kent wrote:
> Thanks for making that clear, it worked great...not sure why I wa
A little help please.
I just accidently deleted the wiki from my server. If anyone still has that
page open in their web browse, please copy-paste the text and e-mail it to
me.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tom Kent wrote:
> Thanks for making that clear, it worked great...not sure why I was
Thanks for making that clear, it worked great...not sure why I was confused
about it in the other message.
I was able to get everything up and running. I've documented my adventures
here:
http://teeks99.com/sys/doku.php?id=openvpn_vm_segregated_net
Thanks for all the input,
Tom
On Fri, May 11, 2
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:45:04PM -0400, Tom Kent wrote:
> The other thing I tried was to have openvpn up and running, then to attach
> the VM to the tap0 device that it created...that ended with this error:
> libvirtError: internal error Failed to add tap interface to bridge. tap0 is
> not a
Hmm, that wasn't very successful. I guess I'm not sure what you mean when
you say to have open vpn use the tap interface right away.
My VM has a couple tap (I assume) interfaces vibr0 vibr1 (I can make more),
which say "br" in the name, but aren't actually bridged to anything
physical, they are ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 15:50, Tom Kent wrote:
>> But... I don't think that OpenVPN is the right approach as it is
> not peer-to-peer solution.
>
> I agree that this is not the optimal solution, especially for
> large/high bandwith setups. I was just looking for
> But... I don't think that OpenVPN is the right approach as it is not
> peer-to-peer
solution.
I agree that this is not the optimal solution, especially for large/high
bandwith setups. I was just looking for something that I could get going
with what I have today. My ideal setup would be a centr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 03:03, Tom Kent wrote:
> I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its
> feasiblehere goes.
>
> I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and
> that got me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good t
Hi,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:03:17PM -0400, Tom Kent wrote:
> The idea I had, and wanted to run by, was if it would be possible to
> integrate an openvpn client into the hypervisor's virtual network card.
> This would make it so that from the moment the VM boots up, it is only
> connected to the
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Tom Kent wrote:
> I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its feasiblehere
> goes.
>
> I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and that got
> me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good tool that could join a
> group of V
I had an idea I wanted to run by people and see if its feasiblehere
goes.
I've been hearing a lot about "virtualized" networking for VMs and that got
me thinking. It seems like OpenVPN would be a good tool that could join a
group of VMs into their own private LAN, basically segregating them fr
11 matches
Mail list logo
