Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi, I'd thoroughly test this with protocols like Google's QUIC, which uses UDP > underneath. How does it respond to such ICMP messages? what does it do to > throughput? > I tested sending ICMP "destination unreachable/fragmentation needed" with Chrome as QUIC client and turns out that it fallback

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi Lev, On 29/11/18 16:18, Lev Stipakov wrote: Some background information. In openvpn3 we decided not to implement fragments, because:  - this is quite a big feature which has to be supported through the whole stack (client, server, kernel module)  - we assume that it is not used by most o

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

On 29/11/2018 10:49, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Hi, > > On 29/11/18 09:03, Samuli Seppänen wrote: >> [...] > >> Had a discussion about --fragment. Agreed that if we can fix internal >> fragmentation without needing a change in frame format then we can >> definitely deprecate --fragment in the long

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

: November 30, 2018 11:16 To: Simon Matter ; Lev Stipakov Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018) Hi Lev, Simon, On 30/11/18 07:10, Simon Matter wrote: Hi Jan Just, (forgot to add openvpn-devel in previous mail

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Matter ; Lev Stipakov Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018) Hi Lev, Simon, On 30/11/18 07:10, Simon Matter wrote: >> Hi Jan Just, >> >> (forgot to add openvpn-devel in previous mail) >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi Lev, Simon, On 30/11/18 07:10, Simon Matter wrote: Hi Jan Just, (forgot to add openvpn-devel in previous mail) Some background information. In openvpn3 we decided not to implement fragments, because: - this is quite a big feature which has to be supported through the whole stack (client

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

> Hi Jan Just, > > (forgot to add openvpn-devel in previous mail) > > Some background information. > > In openvpn3 we decided not to implement fragments, because: > > - this is quite a big feature which has to be supported through the whole > stack (client, server, kernel module) > - we assume th

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi Jan Just, (forgot to add openvpn-devel in previous mail) Some background information. In openvpn3 we decided not to implement fragments, because: - this is quite a big feature which has to be supported through the whole stack (client, server, kernel module) - we assume that it is not used

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi, On 29/11/18 09:03, Samuli Seppänen wrote: [...] Had a discussion about --fragment. Agreed that if we can fix internal fragmentation without needing a change in frame format then we can definitely deprecate --fragment in the long-term. Also noted that lack of tun-mtu support on Windows mig

[Openvpn-devel] Summary of the community meeting (Wed, 28th Nov 2018)

Hi, Here's the summary of the IRC meeting. --- COMMUNITY MEETING Place: #openvpn-meeting on irc.freenode.net Date: Wednesday 28th November 2018 Time: 11:30 CET (10:30 UTC) Planned meeting topics for this meeting were here: The ne