Hi,
Thank you for your comments.
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> Ok, here's another try, even though I didn't get any comments on the
>> first one :-)
>>
>> This is a totally different approach; the previous one was flawed in at
>> least two
On 1/3/07, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Ok, here's another try, even though I didn't get any comments on the
first one :-)
This is a totally different approach; the previous one was flawed in at
least two aspects:
This is better.
But you should use