Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem with Debain 10.6 & openvpn 2.4.7

On 12/28/20 11:47 AM, Colin Ryan wrote: Is the PI the default gateway device on the 178 network? If not then your remote workstation connects, get's given a 10.7 address and is presented routes to the 178 network. However upon leaving the eth0 inteface of your Pi out onto the LAN the LAN ou

[Openvpn-users] Routing problem with Debain 10.6 & openvpn 2.4.7

Good morning everybody, I have no idea why routing doesn't work - and I thing I did everything I have to do to make it work ... When establishing a connection I can only ping the tun-devices ip-adress, and the eht0-devices ip-adress, but I can't ping/traceroute any other device on that network

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing all traffic throuh the VPN tunnel.

Hi, On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:12:55PM +0200, Lampo Bastardo wrote: > Now my (stupid?) question is: since sooner or later the IP packet will > leave the secure VPN tunnel, what is the purpose to make it travel > through the secure VPN tunnel only for the first part of its trip? Why > not use the

[Openvpn-users] Routing all traffic throuh the VPN tunnel.

Maybe someone can help me. About the directive ** push "redirect-gateway def1" ** I have found the following explanation: "Parameter def1: Instead of replacing the existing default gateway, OpenVPN will add two new routes, 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1. These routes together also cover all IPv4 sp

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

On 1/31/2019 1:01 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi, it is probably easiest to run it on the tun0 interface, as you will capture less non-relevant traffic. Set up the tshark/tcpdump filter, then run a 'ping' from the OpenVPN client to the server-side LAN GW straight after the connection has been

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

Hi, On 31/01/19 05:10, Daniel Miller via Openvpn-users wrote: On 1/29/2019 3:45 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi, my answer seems to have gone AWOL. Here it is again: I'm guessing this may be some of the magic of ICMP - but regardless the fact that there's a delay before communication is est

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

On 1/29/2019 3:45 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi, my answer seems to have gone AWOL. Here it is again: I'm guessing this may be some of the magic of ICMP - but regardless the fact that there's a delay before communication is established tells me something isn't right.  I'm fairly confident

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

Hi, my answer seems to have gone AWOL. Here it is again: On 21/01/19 03:24, Daniel Miller via Openvpn-users wrote: On 1/16/2019 6:25 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi, On 14/01/19 23:04, Daniel Miller via Openvpn-users wrote: I have a configuration that probably should be listed in the example

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

On 1/16/2019 6:25 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi, On 14/01/19 23:04, Daniel Miller via Openvpn-users wrote: I have a configuration that probably should be listed in the examples/FAQ - but I'm not seeing what I need. In theory, what you are asking is definitely possible, with proper routing a

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

Hi, On 14/01/19 23:04, Daniel Miller via Openvpn-users wrote: I have a configuration that probably should be listed in the examples/FAQ - but I'm not seeing what I need. OpenVPN server is running on a host in the corporate LAN.  Using TUN/Routed mode.  VPN server has a LAN IP of 192.168.0.2 a

[Openvpn-users] Routing vs NAT for VPN server inside gateway

I have a configuration that probably should be listed in the examples/FAQ - but I'm not seeing what I need. OpenVPN server is running on a host in the corporate LAN.  Using TUN/Routed mode.  VPN server has a LAN IP of 192.168.0.2 and a VPN IP of 10.0.0.1.  This server also provides DNS & DHCP

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing table gets corrupted

one of my syscalls seems to get interrupted May 30 15:41:34 raspberrypi ovpn-client[620]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4) May 30 15:41:34 raspberrypi ovpn-client[620]: /sbin/ip route del 10.8.0.1/32 May 30 15:41:34 raspberrypi ovpn-client[620]: /sbin/ip route del 192.168.3.0/24 M

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing table gets corrupted

I use /etc/default/openvpn Am 30.05.2017 um 13:31 schrieb David Sommerseth: On 30/05/17 12:56, Jannis Ohms wrote: Hi I use openvpn to connect to a remote network and to tunnel all my traffic but my gateway forgets a certin route from time to time my VPN Server runs on 141.41.40.30 default

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing table gets corrupted

On 30/05/17 12:56, Jannis Ohms wrote: > Hi > > I use openvpn to connect to a remote network and to tunnel all my traffic > > but my gateway forgets a certin route from time to time > > my VPN Server runs on 141.41.40.30 > > default 10.8.0.90.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 tun0 > 10.

[Openvpn-users] routing table gets corrupted

Hi I use openvpn to connect to a remote network and to tunnel all my traffic but my gateway forgets a certin route from time to time my VPN Server runs on 141.41.40.30 default 10.8.0.90.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 tun0 10.8.0.110.8.0.9255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Thanks both, Now I have a working system. This is the siteA configuration: # cat /etc/openvpn/vpn.conf remote siteB.domain.net float dev tun proto udp ifconfig 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 persist-tun persist-local-ip persist-remote-ip comp-lzo ping 15 secret /etc/openvpn/static.key script-security 2 route-

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Sachin Garg wrote: > > > > > > Option 1: Leave the routes as before in the config and add a static > > route to the remote vpn ips on the routers: > > On router1: > > # ip route add 10.0.0.2/32 via 192.168.1.10 > > On router 2: > > # ip route

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

On Saturday 02 July 2016 03:13 PM, Selva Nair wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Josu Lazkano > wrote: > > Thanks Selva! > > It works, I remove the routes in the configuration files and execute > this: > > ip route add 192.168.1.0/24

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > Thanks Selva! > > It works, I remove the routes in the configuration files and execute this: > > ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 dev tun0 src 192.168.2.10 > ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev tun0 src 192.168.1.10 > > Now it is working great, the

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Thanks Selva! It works, I remove the routes in the configuration files and execute this: ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 dev tun0 src 192.168.2.10 ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev tun0 src 192.168.1.10 Now it is working great, the only problem is that if I reboot the servers, the lost the routes,

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > Hello again, > > I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. > > site1 server: 192.168.1.10/24 > site1 router/gw: 192.168.1.1/24 > site1 conf: http://paste.debian.net/766912/ > site2 server: 192.168.2.10/24 > site2

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

gt; > > Gesendet: Freitag, 01. Juli 2016 um 12:03 Uhr > Von: "Josu Lazkano" > An: "Sachin Garg" > Cc: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server > Thanks Sachin, > > I want to do it a as site to site confi

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

)?         Gesendet: Freitag, 01. Juli 2016 um 12:03 Uhr Von: "Josu Lazkano" An: "Sachin Garg" Cc: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server Thanks Sachin, I want to do it a as site to site configuration. Regards. 2016-06-30 0:24 GMT+02:0

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Thanks Sachin, I want to do it a as site to site configuration. Regards. 2016-06-30 0:24 GMT+02:00 Sachin Garg : > On Wednesday 29 June 2016 05:41 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Here is a diagram about my setup: http://i65.tinypic.com/2ryj42f.jpg > > So why do you not make one a client,

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

On Wednesday 29 June 2016 05:41 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a diagram about my setup: http://i65.tinypic.com/2ryj42f.jpg So why do you not make one a client, and the other a server? Use Client Configuration files for the client. That way, it will always give the same IP address t

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Hello, Here is a diagram about my setup: http://i65.tinypic.com/2ryj42f.jpg Regards. 2016-06-28 17:31 GMT+02:00 Sachin Garg : > On Tuesday 28 June 2016 05:49 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. >> >> site1 server: 192.16

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

On Tuesday 28 June 2016 05:49 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > Hello again, > > I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. > > site1 server: 192.168.1.10/24 > site1 router/gw: 192.168.1.1/24 > site1 conf: http://paste.debian.net/766912/ > site2 server: 192.168.2.10/24 > site2 rout

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

enstag, 28. Juni 2016 um 11:49 Uhr > Von: "Josu Lazkano" > An: Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server > Hello again, > > I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. > > site1 server: 192.168.1.10/2

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

;Josu Lazkano" > An: Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server > Hello again, > > I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. > > site1 server: 192.168.1.10/24 > site1 router/gw: 192.168.1.1/24 > site1 conf: http://past

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

:49 Uhr Von: "Josu Lazkano" An: Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server Hello again, I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. site1 server: 192.168.1.10/24 site1 router/gw: 192.168.1.1/24 site1 conf: http://paste.

[Openvpn-users] Routing OpenVPN server

Hello again, I configured a site to site OpenVPN with 2 Debian Jessie servers. site1 server: 192.168.1.10/24 site1 router/gw: 192.168.1.1/24 site1 conf: http://paste.debian.net/766912/ site2 server: 192.168.2.10/24 site2 router/gw: 192.168.2.1/24 site2 conf: http://paste.debian.net/766913/ I can

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Selva Nair wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Vnpenguin wrote: > >> >> Here's my current config: http://pastebin.com/i92SA4dh >> > > Configs are ok, except for the redundant push that Jan Just mentioned. > > Here's my network schema: http://s12.post

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Hi On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Axel Glienke wrote: > > my Konfiguration for example: > > Client --r5d.de --> rootserver (r5d.de) ---forwarding: vpn10.8.0.6 --> > myhomeserver > > So i want that only incoming traffic (requests for server) routing > back to the vpn/tun0 > Then "rootserver" mu

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

Hi, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Vnpenguin wrote: > > Here's my current config: http://pastebin.com/i92SA4dh > Configs are ok, except for the redundant push that Jan Just mentioned. Here's my network schema: http://s12.postimg.org/lvl9llv19/Open_VPN_1.png > > With these config, I CAN : > 1

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

Hi, On 2015-12-08 at 12:55 Vnpenguin wrote: > # traceroute -n 192.168.254.8 > traceroute to 192.168.254.8 (192.168.254.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > 1 192.168.1.31 0.194 ms 0.177 ms 0.166 ms > 2 10.100.4.1 40.558 ms 40.601 ms 40.593 ms > 3 * * * > 4 * * * > 5 * * * > 6

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Hi, > > > On 08/12/15 11:00, Vnpenguin wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jan Just Keijser > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 06/12/15 20:43, debbie...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> You _can_ push the Server LAN Route 192.168.254.0/24 >>> fro

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

Hi, On 08/12/15 11:00, Vnpenguin wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jan Just Keijser > wrote: Hi, On 06/12/15 20:43, debbie...@gmail.com wrote: You _can_ push the Server LAN Route 192.168.254.0/24

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/12/15 20:43, debbie...@gmail.com wrote: > >> You _can_ push the Server LAN Route 192.168.254.0/24 >> from the Server to the Client. >> >> Next .. One step at a time: >> You must enable IP_Forwarding on both the VPN CLient an

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

another machine on the client-side LAN from the OpenVPN server itself - finally, try it from a machine on the server-side LAN HTH, JJK > > - Original Message - > From: "Vnpenguin" > To: > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 7:39 AM > Subject: [Openvpn-users] Routi

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Hi Axel, On 12/07/2015 09:49 AM, Axel Glienke wrote: > Sorry, i dont understood: > why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are > public ips with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing > table? Because, that's what you have specified in your routing table: >

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Hi, On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Axel Glienke wrote: > Sorry, i dont understood: > why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are > public ips with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing > table? One is matched by 0.0.0.0/1 (because it's starting

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Hello Bonno, my Konfiguration for example: Client --r5d.de --> rootserver (r5d.de) ---forwarding: vpn10.8.0.6 --> myhomeserver So i want that only incoming traffic (requests for server) routing back to the vpn/tun0 all other from server outgoing traffic (e.g. systemupgrads / rsync with ot

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Hello Axel, > Sorry, i dont understood: > why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are public ips > with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing table? > > > this server is a webserver. over tun0 comes traffic from internet. > also: client -> rootserver (public

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

Sorry, i dont understood: why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are public ips with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing table? this server is a webserver. over tun0 comes traffic from internet. also: client -> rootserver (public ip) ---vpn--> serv

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Axel Glienke wrote: > i have a little question. > > My system: > > ip route: > 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 > default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 > 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 > 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6

[Openvpn-users] Routing

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

;-) - Original Message - From: "Vnpenguin" To: Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 7:39 AM Subject: [Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN > Hi all, > I got running OpenVPN P2P mode between 2 LAN. Here's my network: > > 192.168.254.0/24--192.168.254.4 (OpenVPN server

[Openvpn-users] Routing between two LAN

Hi all, I got running OpenVPN P2P mode between 2 LAN. Here's my network: 192.168.254.0/24--192.168.254.4 (OpenVPN server) <=INTERNET=> 192.168.1.31 (OpenVPN client)--192.168.1.0/24 >From client 192.168.1.31 I can ping anyhost of server LAN (192.168.254.0/24 ). >From another host of client LAN, f

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

That agrees with my understanding. What I didn't know is if a single 192.168.0.0/16 could replace the two 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24 routes. Either way - I'm still not getting the communication I want. Any more ideas/suggestions? --- Daniel On 2015-08-19 10:21, Rui Santos wrote: > Hi

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

Hi Daniel, On 19-08-2015 17:59, dmil...@amfes.com wrote: > Is there a difference between doing 192.168.0.0/16, vs having two routes > of 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24? In your example, the /16 route will never be used when communicating to any of those /24 networks. Routing algorithms specif

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

Is there a difference between doing 192.168.0.0/16, vs having two routes of 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24? My thinking, flawed as it is, is: 1. Both hosts have known routing tables that allow them to communicate. 2. At each host, define an additional route that utilizes the existing routes

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

Erich Titl wrote: >> I already have 192.168.0.0/24 routes on the Windows client > > This route does not cover 192.168.5.x To expand on that just a little bit. 192.168.0.0/24 only covers 192.168.0.1-254, you'd want /16 Doug ---

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

Hi Am 19.08.2015 um 06:55 schrieb dmil...@amfes.com: This is probably more of a "pure" routing question that OpenVPN specific - but where else am I gonna ask? The hosts: I have a server running OpenVPN and VirtualBox. There is a Windows 8 VirtualBox guest on the machine using a bridged ada

[Openvpn-users] Routing multiple networks

This is probably more of a "pure" routing question that OpenVPN specific - but where else am I gonna ask? The hosts: I have a server running OpenVPN and VirtualBox. There is a Windows 8 VirtualBox guest on the machine using a bridged adapter. I have a Windows 8 client running OpenVPN. T

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Gert, JJK, and all-- Thank you all very much for sticking with me. With your help, I have a system that seems to be working. For those who may be looking at this in the archives, I will report what I did: Each of the remote computers, wind and air, are set up as clients of the server. They

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:49:24PM -0400, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: > But there is something wind cannot do that I need it to be able to do: I > want to run redesktop from wind to get into a box sha on the 192.168.0.0 > lan. On air, I can run this and get into that machine, over the 10.8.0

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

On 05/12/2015 11:09 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: >> >> On 05/12/2015 10:54 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> all clients have routes >>> >>> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1 00 eth0 >>> >>> that means you cannot reach the ser

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: > > On 05/12/2015 10:54 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> all clients have routes >> >> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1 00 eth0 >> >> that means you cannot reach the server side LAN 192.168.0.0/24; if >> that is not an issue the

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

On 05/12/2015 10:54 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Hi, > > > all clients have routes > > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1 00 eth0 > > that means you cannot reach the server side LAN 192.168.0.0/24; if > that is not an issue then you're fine. > > apart from that it lo

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: > that would simulate a much more realistic environment and you'd be rid > of the "double" reference to 192.168.0/24 on the VPN client. >> >> OK, went out and bought a new router today. I am running out of time >> today to get it set up, and may not be able to loo

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

that would simulate a much more realistic environment and you'd be rid of the "double" reference to 192.168.0/24 on the VPN client. >> Go for it, >> >> JJK >> > JJK-- > > OK, went out and bought a new router today. I am running out of time > today to get it set up, and may not be able to look at

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

JJK-- On 05/05/2015 01:59 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi Douglas, On 05/05/15 04:58, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/04/2015 02:47 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: On 04/05/15 18:57, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/04/2015 12:41 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 0

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi Douglas, On 05/05/15 04:58, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/04/2015 02:47 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: On 04/05/15 18:57, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/04/2015 12:41 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/01/2015 04:48 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi Douglas,

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi JJK-- On 05/04/2015 12:41 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi Douglas, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: On 05/01/2015 04:48 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi Douglas, On 01/05/15 05:06, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: Friends-- My first post, and by reading this you will see how new I am to openvpn.

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi Douglas, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: > On 05/01/2015 04:48 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: >> Hi Douglas, >> >> On 01/05/15 05:06, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: >>> Friends-- >>> >>> My first post, and by reading this you will see how new I am to >>> openvpn. So please be gentle. >>> >>> I have one

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

On 05/01/2015 04:48 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: Hi Douglas, On 01/05/15 05:06, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: Friends-- My first post, and by reading this you will see how new I am to openvpn. So please be gentle. I have one vpn set up and trying to get a second vpn set up. The two seem to b

Re: [Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Hi Douglas, On 01/05/15 05:06, Douglas D Germann Sr wrote: Friends-- My first post, and by reading this you will see how new I am to openvpn. So please be gentle. I have one vpn set up and trying to get a second vpn set up. The two seem to be conflicting with each other. There is so far on

[Openvpn-users] routing mess (I think)

Friends-- My first post, and by reading this you will see how new I am to openvpn. So please be gentle. I have one vpn set up and trying to get a second vpn set up. The two seem to be conflicting with each other. There is so far only one client machine, but we will be adding another in a fe

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem

max.mus...@kaffeeschluerfer.com writes: > If you want to reach the server from IP 1.2.3.4 the server > will need to now where toroute this IP ;-) > > So in a simple config, the server would only need: > > route 1.2.3.4 Ok, I added that to the server. > you will also need an "iroute" entry for

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem

Hi Jordan, If you want to reach the server from IP 1.2.3.4 the server will need to now where toroute this IP ;-) So in a simple config, the server would only need: route 1.2.3.4 (if its only host 1.2.3.4 this will be sufficient; for a network you will need "route "). BUT, since you have a mu

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem

If I'm understanding what you're trying to do, it falls into that lovely category of either trivial or impossible. If 1.2.3.4 is the un-nat'd IP that the client is connecting from, then, as I understand it, it's nearly impossible because if you route packets to the client IP over the tunnel, then

[Openvpn-users] Routing problem

I have a simple Linux OpenVPN client with the following interfaces: eth01.2.3.4 tun010.0.0.5 The server side of the tunnel is 10.0.0.1 ... >From the client, I can ping the server: % ping -c 3 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

Hi, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > $ sudo sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 > > My immediate reaction was to make a rude reply about how OF COURSE I > already had that set - but I thought I'd look first. Hehe :-) At work (ISP...) I used to say "it's always the

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

On 8/22/2013 2:43 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > From the config files, the routes should be there. > > So my guess is that IPv4 forwarding (router mode!) is not turned on on > the Ubuntu server. No idea how to correctly set this to be automatically > enabled at boot on Ubuntu, but for a quick test, l

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/08/13 11:43, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:10:20PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: >> Hi all. I've been using bridged vpn for a while - now trying to >> get routed working. >> >> My setup: Server side router (mikrotik)

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:10:20PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Hi all. I've been using bridged vpn for a while - now trying to get routed > working. > > My setup: > Server side router (mikrotik) LAN IP 192.168.0.1 > OpenVPN server (ubuntu) LAN IP 192.168.0.3 > OpenVPN pool 10.59.97.0/2

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

On August 22, 2013 12:00:12 AM Jan Just Keijser wrote: > Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > Hi all. I've been using bridged vpn for a while - now trying to get > routed working. > > > > My setup: > > Server side router (mikrotik) LAN IP 192.168.0.1 > > OpenVPN server (ubuntu) LAN IP 192.168.0.3 > > Ope

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Hi all. I've been using bridged vpn for a while - now trying to get routed > working. > > My setup: > Server side router (mikrotik) LAN IP 192.168.0.1 > OpenVPN server (ubuntu) LAN IP 192.168.0.3 > OpenVPN pool 10.59.97.0/24 > Android client 10.59.97.6 > > I can connect

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0“ Then the vpn client knows how to reach the LAN at the server side. Regards Joerg     Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. August 2013 um 03:10 Uhr Von: "Daniel L. Miller" An: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machi

[Openvpn-users] Routing for my multiple machines server side

Hi all. I've been using bridged vpn for a while - now trying to get routed working. My setup: Server side router (mikrotik) LAN IP 192.168.0.1 OpenVPN server (ubuntu) LAN IP 192.168.0.3 OpenVPN pool 10.59.97.0/24 Android client 10.59.97.6 I can connect and communicate between client and server.

[Openvpn-users] Routing

Hi All I have two cloud based VPS machines, one running CentOS 6 and the other FreeBSD-9. I have configured a VPN between my two VPS machines and from my client to each VPS of which all work perfectly. I would like to be able to have one VPN from my client to one of the VPS and be able to au