Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem with Debain 10.6 & openvpn 2.4.7

2020-12-28 Thread Colin Ryan
On 12/28/20 11:47 AM, Colin Ryan wrote: Is the PI the default gateway device on the 178 network? If not then your remote workstation connects, get's given a 10.7 address and is presented routes to the 178 network. However upon leaving the eth0 inteface of your Pi out onto the LAN the LAN

[Openvpn-users] Routing problem with Debain 10.6 & openvpn 2.4.7

2020-12-28 Thread li...@zxt10d.de
Good morning everybody, I have no idea why routing doesn't work - and I thing I did everything I have to do to make it work ... When establishing a connection I can only ping the tun-devices ip-adress, and the eht0-devices ip-adress, but I can't ping/traceroute any other device on that

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem

2013-12-31 Thread Jordan Hayes
max.mus...@kaffeeschluerfer.com writes: If you want to reach the server from IP 1.2.3.4 the server will need to now where toroute this IP ;-) So in a simple config, the server would only need: route 1.2.3.4 Ok, I added that to the server. you will also need an iroute entry for your

[Openvpn-users] Routing problem

2013-12-30 Thread Jordan Hayes
I have a simple Linux OpenVPN client with the following interfaces: eth01.2.3.4 tun010.0.0.5 The server side of the tunnel is 10.0.0.1 ... From the client, I can ping the server: % ping -c 3 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0

Re: [Openvpn-users] Routing problem

2013-12-30 Thread Joe Patterson
If I'm understanding what you're trying to do, it falls into that lovely category of either trivial or impossible. If 1.2.3.4 is the un-nat'd IP that the client is connecting from, then, as I understand it, it's nearly impossible because if you route packets to the client IP over the tunnel, then