we could simply use the api from MyFaces.
LieGrue,
strub
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: gerdo...@apache.org gerdo...@apache.org
An: openwebbeans-comm...@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 27. Oktober 2009, 6:33:20 Uhr
Betreff: svn commit: r830063 -
More correclty, MyFaces supports JSF 2.0 specification?
-Gurkan
2009/10/27 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
Does MyFaces Api support JSF 2.0 Specification?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/10/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
we could simply use the api from MyFaces.
LieGrue,
strub
yes, since ~ 1 year now.
In fact the MyFaces team did a big part of the work on the JSF2 spec ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 27. Oktober 2009, 8:48:21 Uhr
Olee, awesome!
2009/10/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
yes, since ~ 1 year now.
In fact the MyFaces team did a big part of the work on the JSF2 spec ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
An:
Yes, apologise - that was my problem as a poor from-source-compiler ;)
We could itmt use the snapshots from
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-api/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
Not perfect but better than nothing!
I already dropped a request for a milestone
According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an
interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean.
Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow
decorators.
I can't provide a use case off the top
FYI.
- Forwarded Message
From: Gavin King gavin.k...@gmail.com
To: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
Cc: weld-...@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
- Forwarded Message
From: Marius Bogoevici mari...@redhat.com
To: Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com;
openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org; weld-...@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:50:39 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes that
are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark
Yes, this is required and useful.
However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
via the client proxy that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
On Tue,
In Weld, we do apply decorators and interceptors on all managed beans,
including the ones which are @Dependent.
Marius
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:03 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself
Typo in WebBeansUtil::createNewBean() copying interceptor stack from
bean class to managed bean -- see attachment.
Contributed By: Joe Bergmark, Eric Covener
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Index: src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/util/WebBeansUtil.java
Eric,
the right way to provide a patch is by using the JIRA issue tracker.
Doing so makes sure they aren't forgotten.
Can you please upload your patch ?
Thx,
Matthias
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Eric Covener cove...@apache.org wrote:
Typo in WebBeansUtil::createNewBean() copying
component-comp typo interceptor stack copy
---
Key: OWB-147
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-147
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Interceptor and Decorators
14 matches
Mail list logo
