I created an issue for this use case here:
https://github.com/openwisp/openwisp-controller/issues/788 .
Federico
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 06:51, Rajesh Nandi
wrote:
> I am interested
>
> On Sat, 1 Jul, 2023, 3:01 am Shawn Lyons, wrote:
>
>> That worked. I added the two servers in as OpenWRT
I am interested
On Sat, 1 Jul, 2023, 3:01 am Shawn Lyons, wrote:
> That worked. I added the two servers in as OpenWRT devices, used the
> existing Wireguard VPN template, and now It's included those peers when
> passing the webhook data - no more dropping hosts.
> Thanks very much,
> Shawn
>
>
That worked. I added the two servers in as OpenWRT devices, used the
existing Wireguard VPN template, and now It's included those peers when
passing the webhook data - no more dropping hosts.
Thanks very much,
Shawn
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 2:03:51 PM UTC-6 f.capoano wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
Hi Shawn,
an interesting case. I think the best option is to create fake devices
which act as placeholders and reserve the IP addresses you need for these
clients. Otherwise you risk OpenWISP assigning these IPs to other devices
and run into conflicts.
I had tried this in the past and it worked,
