Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Does not compile for me (cannot find the path to the curl header files)
> Please fix and resend.
Fixed.
Signed off by: Conrad Hirano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: package/ndyndns/files/ndyndns.init
===
--- p
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm perusing the generic-2.6.24 linux patches in the svn checkout,
> > and i'm curious about patch 004-extra_optimization.patch:
> >
> > =
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/Makefile 2007-09-21 16:23:55.0 +0800
>
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > to allow overriding from the command line? i always use "?=" to
> > designate that sort of thing, just to make it clear to anyone
> > reading the script.
>
> right currently the stuff is not complete... The ./tmp dir handling
> is missing, therefor
> to allow overriding from the command line? i always use "?="
> to designate that sort of thing, just to make it clear to
> anyone reading the script.
right
currently the stuff is not complete... The ./tmp dir handling is missing,
therefore the build_base was just an preparation.
The drawback
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > so as a start, you can use, say, OUTPUT_DIR as the absolutely
> > top-level output location (defaulting to $(TOPDIR) if you
> > want). and further, each and every build *must* have a
> > BUILD_ID (which could have a default name of, well, "defaul
> so as a start, you can use, say, OUTPUT_DIR as the absolutely
> top-level output location (defaulting to $(TOPDIR) if you
> want). and further, each and every build *must* have a
> BUILD_ID (which could have a default name of, well, "default"
> or something). at that point, building is easy, a
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > given more platforms, isn't it theoretically possible to configure
> > for another platform that just happens to use mipsel and be based
> > on gcc-4.1.2 as well? and if that were the case, wouldn't that
> > second build step all over the previous
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> 2008.02.03. 16:34:20 dátumon Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
>
> >
> > those two AVR-related patches were the only two i didn't upgrade and
> > submit for binutils-2.18 simply because, as you can see, that one
> > patch is *monstrously* large.
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > given more platforms, isn't it theoretically possible to configure
> > for another platform that just happens to use mipsel and be based
> > on gcc-4.1.2 as well? and if that were the case, wouldn't that
> > second build step all over the previous
2008.02.03. 16:34:20 dátumon Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
>
> those two AVR-related patches were the only two i didn't upgrade and
> submit for binutils-2.18 simply because, as you can see, that one
> patch is *monstrously* large. where did it come from? is there
> someone who's
>
> given more platforms, isn't it theoretically possible to
> configure for another platform that just happens to use
> mipsel and be based on
> gcc-4.1.2 as well? and if that were the case, wouldn't that
> second build step all over the previous build?
>
> in short, unless you can guarantee co
those two AVR-related patches were the only two i didn't upgrade and
submit for binutils-2.18 simply because, as you can see, that one
patch is *monstrously* large. where did it come from? is there
someone who's responsible for the AVR-related openwrt content? it
doesn't make much difference
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > in all this discussion, i don't think we've addressed the original
> > > subject -- why do "make clean" and "make dirclean" require a .config
> > > file, such that they'll d
Hi there,
Is it possible to test openwrt bin file without flushing it to linksys?
Could somebody tell me how to install l2tp dialer on linksys?
Thanks, Serge.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > in all this discussion, i don't think we've addressed the original
> > subject -- why do "make clean" and "make dirclean" require a .config
> > file, such that they'll dump you into "make meuconfig" if you don't
> > have one?
On Feb 1, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Does not compile for me (cannot find the path to the curl header
> files)
> Please fix and resend.
The package was successfully compiling with 7.09, but it fails to
compile with the trunk. The difference I found is that in 7.09, the
value o
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:04:04AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > This patch adds utilities ping, ping6, tracepath, ... from iputils.
> > It creates one ipkg package per program.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zajicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Applied in r10364, cleaned up slig
17 matches
Mail list logo
