Hi,
> So, should I fix package/ppp/files/ppp.sh like this:
> -config_get_bool defaultroute "$cfg" defaultroute 1
> +config_get_bool defaultroute "$cfg" defaultroute 0
>
> Or should anybody fix the LuCI page to handle the missing option as "1"
> as well?
IRC discussion resulted in
Hi,
at last I got a working UMTS connection with my Alix board.
When I have a look at the LuCI WAN setup page, there is an option
"Replace default route" which is not set.
This results in a uci config for "wan" WITHOUT "option defaultroute" set:
config 'interface' 'wan'
option 'ifname' 'p
Hi Hinko Koncevar
many thanks for your reply. Today I test root=mtd1 but the result don't change.
-
VFS: Cannot open root device "mtd1" or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS:
Jose Vasconcellos wrote:
The attached patch adds LED support and enables
all the PHYs on the switch. This patches kernels
2.6.26, 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
Signed-off-by: Jose Vasconcellos
bozo alert! Including patch this time :)
Index: target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.26/500-usr8200_support.patch
The attached patch adds LED support and enables
all the PHYs on the switch. This patches kernels
2.6.26, 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
Signed-off-by: Jose Vasconcellos
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for embedded devices.
>
>> (ok. It was a kind of joke, but this is actually the goal of OpenWrt; to
>> develop a Linux based embedded system for both final solutions and
>> development)
>
> That begs the question: what's th
Gregers Petersen wrote:
> Hi Jose
>
> Jose Vasconcellos wrote:
>
>> Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
>>
>> I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt.
>> Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt
>> as an organization. What are its goals?
>>
>>
>
> Op
> OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for embedded devices.
> (ok. It was a kind of joke, but this is actually the goal of OpenWrt; to
> develop a Linux based embedded system for both final solutions and
> development)
That begs the question: what's the difference between OpenWRT
and
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Andy Boyett wrote:
> Make it x86 specific and I'll commit it. No sense in building modules on
> platforms that will never use them.
JFYI, AMD's CS5536 companion chip is also used on Lemote's Fuloong, which is
mips: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2928309621.html.
Gr{oetje,
Hi Jose
Jose Vasconcellos wrote:
> Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
>
> I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt.
> Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt
> as an organization. What are its goals?
>
OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for em
> Make it x86 specific and I'll commit it. No sense in building modules on
> platforms that will never use them.
done.
Index: package/kernel/modules/other.mk
===
--- package/kernel/modules/other.mk (revision 13915)
+++ package/kerne
Make it x86 specific and I'll commit it. No sense in building modules on
platforms that will never use them.
-Andy
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
I added support to build a package containing the cs5535_gpio.ko module.
This is needed for my Alix 6b2 to switch GPIO pin 1 to select the SIM
holder used for 3G connections.
bye,
Markus
Index: package/kernel/modules/other.mk
=
13 matches
Mail list logo
