On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> What's the difference between writing the flash using the `mtd' utility,
> or writing it by catting into /dev/mtdblockN ?
Ideally you want to use the mtd command.
The problem with flash is that you can't simply write to it one byte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
A typical write with mtd spans across multiple partitions (linux, rootfs, maybe
rootfs_data). I don't think this is possible by catting stuff into
/dev/mtdblockN unless
you start to cut the image in pieces with dd and friends, but at this point
What's the difference between writing the flash using the `mtd' utility,
or writing it by catting into /dev/mtdblockN ?
Stefan
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
Hi Puchu,
I have looked a little though your patches, not completely and I did no
testing. Especially for uClibc there has to be done more.
I found this lines, in my opinion there are wrong:
+KERNEL_HEADERS="/mnt/devel/openwrt/openwrt.vanilla/build_dir/toolchain-mips_gcc-4.1.2_uClibc-0.9.30/linux
forgot the ntp patch here it is
greets
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile (Revision 14026)
+++ Makefile (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
PKG_NAME:=ntp
-PKG_VERSION:=4.2.4p4
+PKG_VERSION:=4.2.4p6
Hi after some time playing around i created this patches and extended some
from dev.openwrt.org
uclibc-0.9.30.patch: patches taken and updated from ticket #4271 ...
uClibc update patch + mipsel config
vnstat.patch vnstat is creating a false crontab entry: it is using wrong dirs
and its al
Hi Guys,
I would like understand if (and, when and how) the ubifs filesystem
(successor of jffs2) will be supported.
>From my checks, I noticed 3 points where changes will applied in order
to support the ubifs:
- tools/mtd -> to add host crosstools for make ubifs
- packages/mtd -> to add targe
