Hi!
I'm trying to setup an Ad-Hoc networking using one common shared AES-256
(CCMP) key.
Is WPA-NONE supported in OpenWrt? What's the intended way of securing an
Ad-Hoc IBSS network with a shared key?
In the Forum, the question remains unanswered
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=1607
Hi all,
In r18159 representation of floating point numbers in the LNUM patch was
changed from double to float. This has side effects which I find very
hard to justify. 32-bit integer cannot be represented as a
single-precision floating point number without loss of precision.
We've run into this p
i am going to spent a few days next week working on the danube support,
so i will do the arv4518 at the same time. i will also be merging ata
support whilst at it :D
thx for finding the patches
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
>> Al 30/09/10 19:53, En/na John Crispin ha
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
Al 30/09/10 19:53, En/na John Crispin ha escrit:
we can make uboot for many of the other arcaydian boards and i will be
adding them to the wiki next week. however for the ARV4518 and ARV4519
we have no uboot yet due to a missing switch driver. i hope to find the
2010.10.05. 12:15 keltezéssel, Helmut Schaa írta:
> Taking the ramips ethernet interface down and up again resulted in the
> driver not receiving any frames anymore. Fix this by correctly disabling
> interrupts in the hw on ifdown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
Applied in r23243.
Thanks,
Gabo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
13.09.2010 19:40, Esa Hyytia wrote:
> ... to compile the firmware with "ramdisk" option, upload the image to
> RAM from bootloader (via serial interface) using tftp, and booting the
> image from RAM without flashing it at all. This works nicely for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Looks like this is a bug in the OpenWRT build system, it might be
> reasonable to
> fire the bug report against this.
... it's just an enhancement for source ball developers (like dist & distcheck)
.
Let me add it today night to svn .
br
Ralph
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
05.10.2010 15:54, ralph.hem...@lantiq.com wrote:
> core$hg diff include/subdir.mk
> diff --git a/include/subdir.mk b/include/subdir.mk
> --- a/include/subdir.mk
> +++ b/include/subdir.mk
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> # See /LICENSE for more information.
> #
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> would allow me to catch build configuration mistakes earlier and don't
> waste a
> lot of time on debugging later.
core$hg diff include/subdir.mk
diff --git a/include/subdir.mk b/include/subdir.mk
- --- a/include/subdir.mk
+++ b/include/subdir.mk
@
Taking the ramips ethernet interface down and up again resulted in the
driver not receiving any frames anymore. Fix this by correctly disabling
interrupts in the hw on ifdown.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
---
target/linux/ramips/files/drivers/net/ramips.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertion
I'll bump the compilers for way more targets after some testing, then nuke
4.1.2.
Imre
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:27:47 +0200, Roberto Riggio
wrote:
Current Config.version does not define a gcc version for the x86
target. As a result
version 4.1.2 is used.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Riggio
--
Hi.
I pushed your opkg patch upstream, see
http://code.google.com/p/opkg/source/detail?r=576.
Opkg was updated in trunk at r23230, the sysupgrade integration was
added in r23233. Both changes have been merged to the Backfire branch.
I still left the whole /etc/config/ in place since some file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
05.10.2010 10:42, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> What about doing the following instead:
>
> make package/helloworld/{clean,prepare,compile,install} V=99 ?
>
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>
> The 'configure' target you are looking for is 'prepare'
>
Un
As suggested by Florian, I'm submitting a patch that removes
the honour-copts CFLAG when using an external toolchain.
With the flag I'm getting this error when trying to compile
a package (the click router):
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-fhonour-copts"
Signed-off-by: Rober
On 10/04/2010 11:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi Roberto,
Hi
I suppose you are using an external toolchain right?
This is something that confuses me. I see from the package-default file
that the flag honour-copts is specified only when external toolchain is
used. However, I'm using the defa
15 matches
Mail list logo
