Inline is better for commenting the patch, as the comment can be placed
directly at the discussed location.
But a mangled patch is hard to apply.
If it is attached it normally doesn't get mangled, but then commenting
is harder as the relevant code is not shown.
So if you are sure that the patch
Dies schrieb Matthias Buecher / Germany (m...@maddes.net):
So if you are sure that the patch is not mangled by your mail client (no
wraps, no tabs to spaces), then inline is definitely preferred.
Maybe setting some options in your mail client will avoid this behaviour.
Can you point me to the
On 22.11.2010 09:35, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
Dies schrieb Matthias Buecher / Germany (m...@maddes.net):
So if you are sure that the patch is not mangled by your mail client (no
wraps, no tabs to spaces), then inline is definitely preferred.
Maybe setting some options in your mail client will
Gr... Whatever I try it compiles now (even my own .config works)...
Weird since there is nothing changed to the iptables package lately (or
related things?).
Only change I can think of is the update to Kubuntu 10.10 (from 10.04),
but that was a while ago as well. Unfortunately I do not have a
Hello,
the following patches points to a compilation problem with svn
revision r24041 and gives one possible solution.
Bye,
Joerg
Index: package/mac80211/patches/800-b43-gpio-mask-module-option.patch
===
---
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:51:22 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote:
Gr... Whatever I try it compiles now (even my own .config works)...
Weird since there is nothing changed to the iptables package lately (or
related things?).
Only change I can think of is the update to Kubuntu
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:37:37 +0100, Marcus Osdoba
marcus.osd...@googlemail.com wrote:
Currently I'm working on improved dockstar support for OpenWrt. The
current toolchain 4.3.3+cs is not that up to date and linaro 4.5 branch
is already included. Unfortunatly, this version does not
