Hi Gert,
I've been keeping an eye on the openvpn project but I haven't seen 2.3.2 drop
yet. Can we push forward with 2.3.1?
Adam
On May 30, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:17:13PM -0400, Adam Gensler wrote:
>> The following patch bumps OpenVPN to 2.
Seems these got forgotten:
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/project/openwrt/list/?submitter=235
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
2013/5/31 Jonas Gorski
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> > Updated version of the patch without hardcoded interface. lanaddr isn't
> > used anymore so drop it.
> >
> > Use the --interface-name option of dnsmasq to add a DNS record for the
> > openwrt box. Starting with d
On 31.05.2013 13:48, devendra.aaru wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf
> wrote:
>> * devendra.aaru [31.05.2013 13:44]:
>>> The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source
>>> code of iozone and i bit modified it since it doesn't compile (aio.h
>>> and as
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> Updated version of the patch without hardcoded interface. lanaddr isn't
> used anymore so drop it.
>
> Use the --interface-name option of dnsmasq to add a DNS record for the
> openwrt box. Starting with dnsmasq 2.67test5 it does even work fo
Dear Felix
Thanks for your reply quickly
About Q2 : maybe it doesn't make sense , but why can It change mode from 11n to
11b/g when I tried only to ping the AP address(using ping command to ping AP
address)？ ( it has changed mode about 100m and the longest distance can achieve
200m )But if I tr
On 2013-05-31 1:42 PM, bing_chou wrote:
> Dear Felix
>
> 1. thanks for your Q1 answer , is it wifi spec？ or hostapd definition ？
I think it's wifi spec, not sure exactly. Either way, disabling WMM
definitely breaks aggregation.
> 2. Q2 : I mean that why does it not change mode from 11n to 11 b/g
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * devendra.aaru [31.05.2013 13:44]:
>> The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source
>> code of iozone and i bit modified it since it doesn't compile (aio.h
>> and async io operations are missing in the current toolch
* devendra.aaru [31.05.2013 13:44]:
> The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source
> code of iozone and i bit modified it since it doesn't compile (aio.h
> and async io operations are missing in the current toolchain base).
your patch should be a "Makefile" and a folder "/p
Dear Felix
1. thanks for your Q1 answer , is it wifi spec？ or hostapd definition ？
2. Q2 : I mean that why does it not change mode from 11n to 11 b/g , when I set
wmm_enabled=1 and moved the client device that make the distance increased
between the client and AP？
Thanks
-Bing
-Origina
Hello All,
I am able to create a iozone package and run on some Alix, as well as
the Intel Atom platforms, and i would like to contribute it to the
openwrt, will anybody interested taking this in?
The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source
code of iozone and i bit modifie
Hi,
The current generic multi-wan implementation does not work properly when a
device is connected to multiple overlapping subnets. Reaching machines outside
the networks work, but attempts to reach machines inside the networks will
always go through the first interface that was added with the sub
On 2013-05-31 8:02 AM, bing_chou wrote:
> Dear all
>
>
>
> Some questions , please everybody help me , thanks
>
>
>
> 1.Why does the client’s bit rate highest only show 54M (11g) , when I
> set wmm_enabled=0
>
> on the AP？is this normal status？
That's normal because 802.11n requires WMM t
13 matches
Mail list logo
