Hi,
can you already switch the power on/off for the socket ?
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 6/8/2013 8:10 PM, Mitch Kelly wrote:
Hi,
The 703N can only supply 200mA out the USB port, Its likely this issue
is caused by the device using more power that can be supplied and the
device resetting.
TP-Link have a compatibility Martix for devices, It is based on Power
consumption,
On 6/8/2013 8:10 PM, Mitch Kelly wrote:
Hi,
The 703N can only supply 200mA out the USB port, Its likely this issue
is caused by the device using more power that can be supplied and the
device resetting.
TP-Link have a compatibility Martix for devices, It is based on Power
consumption,
on small custom device with rt3052, 16MB RAM, 4MB SPI-FLASH
Is it an known issue?
Are there any advices?
Best regards.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
My understanding is that OpenWRT Attitude Adjustment, along with current
versions of trunk, are not expected to run in any reliable way under less
than 32MB of RAM. In particular, the v3.x kernel is not supported for so
little memory, and the OpenWRT dev community likewise doesn't support it.
On
Try to use 'openwrt' theme (old)
10.06.2013 22:13 пользователь Ben West b...@gowasabi.net написал:
My understanding is that OpenWRT Attitude Adjustment, along with current
versions of trunk, are not expected to run in any reliable way under less
than 32MB of RAM. In particular, the v3.x
On 10.06.2013 20:13, Ben West wrote:
My understanding is that OpenWRT Attitude Adjustment, along with current
versions of trunk, are not expected to run in any reliable way under less
than 32MB of RAM. In particular, the v3.x kernel is not supported for so
little memory, and the OpenWRT dev
My understanding is that OpenWRT Attitude Adjustment, along with current
versions of trunk, are not expected to run in any reliable way under less
than 32MB of RAM. In particular, the v3.x kernel is not supported for so
little memory, and the OpenWRT dev community likewise doesn't support it.
Hi Jinzcheng. Indeed, you are correct that LUCI's speed of operation would
not be directly related to memory requirements for a v3.x kernel.
Likewise, Manuel is correct that older versions of OpenWRT should run OK
with 16MB RAM, e.g. Backfire v10.03.1 or so, and that pre-compiling LUCI's
source
This is a bug in openocd. I have a fix but what to do with it is being
discussed on the openocd list.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Karl P ka...@tweak.net.au wrote:
I've seen this a lot with openocd and arm cortex-m targets. There's always
lots of finger pointing, but it's incompatible gdb
10 matches
Mail list logo
