Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Mulvihill
It was originally posted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/hh2b4ever/files/ The file is 904-MIPS-lantiq-nand.patch in http://sourceforge.net/projects/hh2b4ever/files/Patches-20120414.zip There is also a compilation of bits and pieces from the original factory firmware, including the nand driver

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread Luka Perkov
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Ben Mulvihill wrote: > Any enlightenment you can provide will be gratefully received. I have not tested this patch yet but it could be related to your problem... Luka >From ad77bb90cbebcd107e81722e1fbdcff91fe55614 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antonio

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread John Crispin
Hi, i am pretty sure the pinmux is set correctly on the board, however i will reverify it. do you have a link to btsimonh's 3.3.8 patch ? John On 21/01/2014 23:52, Ben Mulvihill wrote: > Hi John, > > Thank you. I had assumed this would probably only be of any use > on the HH2B. If you are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread John Crispin
On 21/01/2014 21:55, David Lang wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Ben Mulvihill wrote: > >> The nand driver currently in trunk works fine, provided ... > > what is the current status of nand flash support? I asked about this > within the last couple of weeks and was told that supporing devices > with

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Zabbix: update to 2.2.1

2014-01-21 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
With this new version of zabbix we do not need uname and hostname anymore, see https://svn.zabbix.com/browse/ZBX-5616 Only compile tested for now Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER --- admin/zabbix/Makefile | 10 ++ admin/zabbix/patches/001-cross_compile.pa

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Mulvihill
I should perhaps have said "provided there are no bad blocks on the part of the nand occupied by the squashfs", and "provided that ubox mount_root is patched so that it distinguishes between jffs2 on nor and jffs2 on nand". But I suspect I shouldn't really be using a squashfs image on nand at all.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Mulvihill
Hi John, Thank you. I had assumed this would probably only be of any use on the HH2B. If you are going to try it (or bits of it) out on the fritz3370, I should perhaps add that BTSimonh's patch for the 3.3.8 kernel (I take it he didn't ever submit it here?) also reset the chip in the chip select f

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014/1/21 James Cloos : >> "SM" == Sebastian Moeller writes: > > SM> That truly was reported on semiaccurate.com as an atom part: > SM> > http://semiaccurate.com/2014/01/06/linksys-wrt1900ac-spritual-successor-wrt54g/ > > Thanks for finding that! > > SM> (but later updated with a correcti

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: backport dd conv=swab from 1.22

2014-01-21 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014/1/21 Matti Laakso : > Some boards have the WLAN EEPROM stored in flash in big-endian format, > whereas the driver requires the EEPROM in little-endian format. The > conv=swab option in dd is particularly useful in this case. This patch > backports this feature from busybox-1.22. Since this is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread James Cloos
> "SM" == Sebastian Moeller writes: SM> That truly was reported on semiaccurate.com as an atom part: SM> http://semiaccurate.com/2014/01/06/linksys-wrt1900ac-spritual-successor-wrt54g/ Thanks for finding that! SM> (but later updated with a correction) -JimC -- James Cloos Ope

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Aaron Z wrote: > Perhaps marketing is watching this thread? It now reads: > "Open Source is a vehicle for other communities, such as DD-WRT, Open WRT, > and Tomato, to create their own custom versions of open source firmware for > the product. OpenWRT developers

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi John, On Jan 21, 2014, at 21:41 , John Crispin wrote: > > On 21/01/2014 21:35, James Cloos wrote: >>> "JC" == John Crispin writes: >> JC> * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell >> >> IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor. That truly was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Ben Mulvihill wrote: The nand driver currently in trunk works fine, provided ... what is the current status of nand flash support? I asked about this within the last couple of weeks and was told that supporing devices with nand flash would require major surgery to the sq

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread John Crispin
Hi Ben, oh dear, how i hate the ebu ... i will start by testing this patch on the fritz3370 where i have been seeing jffs2 errors. in general i am all for merging this, i will need a few days to think about this. John On 21/01/2014 20:50, Ben Mulvihill wrote: > Together with other contribu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread John Crispin
On 21/01/2014 21:35, James Cloos wrote: >> "JC" == John Crispin writes: > JC> * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell > > IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor. > > -JimC > -- > James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 i beg to differ, please get your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread James Cloos
> "JC" == John Crispin writes: JC> * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-de

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] packages: libdaemon: prevent an erroneous error message

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Heimpold
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold --- I sent this patch already upstream to Lennart Poettering, however, he didn't respond yet. libs/libdaemon/Makefile|4 +-- .../patches/001-daemon_set_verbosity.patch | 30 2 files changed, 32 insert

[OpenWrt-Devel] BT Home Hub 2B support - nand driver patch (for comment only)

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Mulvihill
Together with other contributors at the now defunct psidoc site, I have produced a device tree and some patches to get the BT Home Hub 2B (Lantiq Danube-S) working with recent trunk builds. More work is needed before they are ready for submitting, but before going any further, I'd be very grateful

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: backport dd conv=swab from 1.22

2014-01-21 Thread Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Hello Matti, I was the one who sent the patch for getting swab support in busybox. Here you can find the patch that I sent: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4708147/busybox/bb_swab.patch However, Denys Vlasenko committed a modified version of the patch because, according to him, my version wa

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq: do an endianness swap to the RT2860 eeprom for ARV752DPW(22)

2014-01-21 Thread Matti Laakso
ARV752DPW and ARV752DPW22 have the RT2860 eeprom stored in flash as big-endian, but the driver needs it in little-endian format. We have to swab it before handing it over. This requires my earlier patch for busybox. Funnily enough, ARV752DPW works also with the incorrect eeprom, but undoubtedly un

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: backport dd conv=swab from 1.22

2014-01-21 Thread Matti Laakso
Some boards have the WLAN EEPROM stored in flash in big-endian format, whereas the driver requires the EEPROM in little-endian format. The conv=swab option in dd is particularly useful in this case. This patch backports this feature from busybox-1.22. Signed-off-by: Matti Laakso --- Index: trunk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: enable CONFIG_HOSTNAME

2014-01-21 Thread etienne . champetier
Hi all, for the hostname problem we can just update zabbix to 2.2.x see https://svn.zabbix.com/browse/ZBX-5616 For the who part, is there a way to know the number of connected users in /proc or ... - Mail original - > De: "Bastian Bittorf" > À: "OpenWrt Development List" > Envoyé: Mar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: enable CONFIG_HOSTNAME

2014-01-21 Thread Bastian Bittorf
* Stefan Hellermann [21.01.2014 10:09]: > What do the maintainers of openwrt/busybox think? Is it useful to have a > hostname binary on a router/access point? Maybe for shell scripts or > some web-interface? If yes, can you add it? is the applet 'hostname' really just needed for getting the hostn

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: enable CONFIG_HOSTNAME

2014-01-21 Thread Stefan Hellermann
Hi Etienne, yes, "system.hostname" is still broken, and "system.users.num" is also broken, the last one needs busybox who. I'm using "agent.hostname" instead of "system.hostname", I don't need "system.users.num" and deploy my configuration files from a central place. But you're right, it's probab

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] busybox: enable CONFIG_HOSTNAME

2014-01-21 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
Hi Stefan, With your patch, system.hostname is still broken, and you have to reconfigure all zabbix agent. I prefer to patch zabbix (if busybox hostname is a nogo) Regards, Etienne Stefan Hellermann a écrit : >Hi Etienne, > >we don't really need busybox hostname, we can read it directly from