Hi,
For reference sake in case anyone else comes across this thread I have
upgraded to the latest:
BARRIER BREAKER (Bleeding Edge, r40820) May 22 2014
I am seeing better behaviour now.
first -> wlan0
second -> wlan0-1
third -> wlan0-2
I also have to run the following commands a few times afte
Hi !
On 23.05.2014 15:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
- submit it as a patch to procd git instead of openwrt
- rename the command to 'exec' or something like that. It could be used
for more than just sysupgrade.
- make "arguments" a string array and maybe combine it with "command"
- maybe add an option
Hi!
On 23.05.2014 16:12, John Crispin wrote:
ok, i will rework the series and merge the first 2 patches in the next
days.
i noticed the series passes the cmdline of sysupgrade which is a bit
ugly so i will change that to using imagename + preserve_settings or
similar
That sounds good:-) Can'
Hi!
On 23.05.2014 15:08, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
is this neccessary ? should a forced detach not be enough ? that is
why we added the forced detach ioctl.
could you try to use "ubi detach rootfs" instead of unmount ?
Damn, I did not notice this. I have to use a different kernel source..
Thank
Hi !
On 23.05.2014 15:03, Daniel wrote:
I built a quite feature-complete and by now well-working sysupgrade for the
oxnas fork
https://www.gitorious.org/openwrt-oxnas/openwrt-oxnas/source/8d0f5e4025d5d9d2c129914b59c03d7c2cde5d93:target/linux/oxnas/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
That looks
Support for Comtrend VR-3025u and VR-3025un.
This patch adds support for both VR-3025u and VR-3025un.
Due to these routers are very close in terms of board definitions
because the only differences are a led name and the board_id, the patch
covers both boards.
Signed off by: José Vázquez Ferná
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/2014 04:12 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> ok, i will rework the series and merge the first 2 patches in the next
> days.
>
> i noticed the series passes the cmdline of sysupgrade which is a bit ugly
> so i will change that to using imagename + p
See if this helps:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=pt&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.wirelesspt.net%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D23%26t%3D730&sandbox=1
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwirelesspt.net%2Fwiki%2FEnergia_Solar
On 05/23/2014 04:58 AM, valen
Hi everybody,
to deploy minimal OpenWrt images on multiple routers it is necessary to
set a root password, while building the deployable file.
Therefore i added a patch that is setting a "default" password in the
"/etc/shadow" file of the "base-files" package. It is using the openssl
command
On 23/05/2014 16:47, André Valentin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> currently I cannot comment this, I will do it in the late evening.
> But please notice that this was a request for comments. It was not
> intended to be merged, because there are still some minor and ugly
> things in it. I just wanted to know
Hi!
currently I cannot comment this, I will do it in the late evening. But please
notice that this was a request for comments. It was not intended to be merged,
because there are still some minor and ugly things in it.
I just wanted to know what you think about this before I invest more time in
Depending on the type of node usage would be 5, 10 and 15W for three
typical nodes. Hope this helps.
--
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent
On 23/05/2014 15:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> I agree with the general approach, but I'd like you to make a few
> changes to it:
>
> - submit it as a patch to procd git instead of openwrt - rename the
> command to 'exec' or something like that. It could be used for more
> than just sysupgrade. -
On 23/05/2014 15:13, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Replacing pid 1 is the safest, cleanest and most generic solution
> as it will support any kind of underlying storage system so you can
> e.g. umount an ext4 root or perform LVM ops in case the system runs
> from a volume group etc.
>
> ~ Jow
ok, i
Dear Sir
Any one please tell me What openwrt router would do when one connected station
is out of range?
Because router can't receive any respone from this station, if it would
continue to send packets to this station?
And how to capture the wireless log to debug router's action in this scene?
On 2014-05-22 22:16, André Valentin wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: André Valentin
> ---
> package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch | 73
> +
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch
I agree with the gene
Hey.
> is this neccessary ? should a forced detach not be enough ? that is
> why we added the forced detach ioctl.
The forced detaching might solve the issue for the ubi case but not in a
general way.
Replacing pid 1 is the safest, cleanest and most generic solution as it
will support any kind of
Hi,
is this neccessary ? should a forced detach not be enough ? that is
why we added the forced detach ioctl.
could you try to use "ubi detach rootfs" instead of unmount ?
John
On 23/05/2014 14:40, Daniel wrote:
> Hi André,
>
> I'm also working a lot on UBI(fs) support lately. First
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I built a quite feature-complete and by now well-working sysupgrade for the
oxnas fork
https://www.gitorious.org/openwrt-oxnas/openwrt-oxnas/source/8d0f5e4025d5d9d2c129914b59c03d7c2cde5d93:target/linux/oxnas/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
I re-bas
On 05/22/2014 10:16 PM, André Valentin wrote:
> diff --git a/package/base-files/files/sbin/sysupgrade
> b/package/base-files/files/sbin/sysupgrade
> index 479cbad..5159367 100755
> --- a/package/base-files/files/sbin/sysupgrade
> +++ b/package/base-files/files/sbin/sysupgrade
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/22/2014 10:16 PM, André Valentin wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: André Valentin ---
> package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch | 73
> + 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644
> package/system/procd/patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi André,
I'm also working a lot on UBI(fs) support lately. First of all, a patch like
this one is needed also for squashfs on ubiblock or any platform with a root
device which actually got some sort of locking...
I used a hack jow made at some point
Hi, Joshua and list.
On 23 May 2014 11:42, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> On 2014-05-22 20:17, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>>
>>
I am using PPPoSSH with ipset-enabled dnsmasq [1] mainly
for accessing and accelerating the speed of several websites. Well,
I myself quite enjoy the outcome.
>>
Well, without the Watts or Current consumed it's impossible to make
any estimations. Just a rough guess based on other people's usage as you
mentioned below.
Fernando
On 23/05/2014 12:47, heini66 wrote:
the wr741 is running with 5v dc. i talked to the user and he toled me,
it is possible to
Can you specify the usage(in Watts) of these equipment you mentioned and
voltage ?
A 50W solar panel looks Ok, but you need to calculate the usage in Amps
so you can find out how long the battery of that capacity can run
without sun and you need the Watts and Voltage for that.
Fernando
On 23
might be helpfull
http://wiki.freifunk.net/Mobiler_UMTS-Router
sorry for german, but site is only german...
cheers
martin
2014-05-23 11:28 GMT+02:00 Bastian Bittorf :
> * valent.turko...@gmail.com [23.05.2014
> 11:22]:
> > So 92Ah is much too big, but is 7Ah too small? Does anybody have
> expe
Hi Tim,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:25:32AM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> The pps-gpio kernel module supports Pulse-Per-Second provided by a GPIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
> ---
> package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk | 16
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Applied with mino
* valent.turko...@gmail.com [23.05.2014 11:22]:
> So 92Ah is much too big, but is 7Ah too small? Does anybody have experience
> with batteries and solar power?
i have and: it depends (TM)
look out for you _local_ "Solar Radiation" and Temperature.
here in Germany during wintertime we have no use
How do you calculate ideal battery for solar nodes? I know that it depends
on how much routers there are planned. But for example let's use solar node
that has one nanostation nanobridge for unplink and picostation for AP.
I guess that 50W solar panel should be enough, right? But how big should
th
Hi Felix,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12:55PM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> The settings require that the OpenWrt provided u-boot is used as either
> first or second stage bootloader as it modifies the partitioning scheme
> to move the u-boot environment to a separate mtd partition.
>
> Signed-of
Hi Felix,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12:54PM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> This patch modifies the u-boot config for the Pogoplug E02 to work with
> OpenWRT.
> It also enables building a second stage bootloader image.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele
> ---
> package/boot/uboot-kirkwood/Makefi
Hi Felix,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12:53PM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> this also fixes a typo in the UBIFS_OPTS
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele
> ---
> .../kirkwood/patches-3.14/150-pogoplug_e02.patch | 127
> +
> target/linux/kirkwood/profiles/120-pogoplug.mk
32 matches
Mail list logo
