On 26/08/2014 17:10, Tyler Fenby wrote:
> LuCI creates "domain" UCI config sections, which the dnsmasq init
> file then, currently, translates into "address" config lines. This
> is not the correct usage of "address" (see r36943), and also causes
> rDNS records to not be created. This patches dns
Hi,
1) the patch is not sent inline but as an attachement
2) the patch does not apply with git am due to the windows style new lines
please start sending inline patches that are unix style and have no
whitespace errors
i am marking this one as rejected
John
On 25/08/2014 14:44, L. D. Pi
Hello All,
I am having issues implementing GPIO definitions in the DTS file for
the AsiaRF board that we are trying to bring up. This is seemingly
an easy task but for the life of me I can't figure out why this is
not working. First some info.
From t
On 28 August 2014 11:11, Alive4Ever wrote:
> Hello developers.
>
> Probably you are annoyed by people asking which revision is Barrier Breaker
> RC3 or similar, because they want to be able to compile the specific release
> theirselves.
>
> To address this issue, I think it would be better to add
Hello developers.
Probably you are annoyed by people asking which revision is Barrier Breaker
RC3 or similar, because they want to be able to compile the specific release
theirselves.
To address this issue, I think it would be better to add git revision commit
hash for each Openwrt release announ
> So, it shouldn't be necessary with the C implementation?
Correct, but that cannot be changed without breaking support for legacy
APIs.
>
>> Simply replacing dashes with underscores is not possible either as this
>> would lead to ambiguous results.
>
> Yes, I've got exactly this problem: the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:49:21PM +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes there is a reason, the initial uci implementation was shell based
> and section names are part of generated variable names which must not
> contain dashes.
So, it shouldn't be necessary with the C implementation?
> Si
Hi,
yes there is a reason, the initial uci implementation was shell based
and section names are part of generated variable names which must not
contain dashes.
Simply replacing dashes with underscores is not possible either as this
would lead to ambiguous results.
~ Jow
_
Hi,
According to [1], it should be possible to parse list of options in a UCI
file using an "option_cb()" callback.
It does not seem to work as expected, for instance this block:
config example
list 'import_table' '42'
list 'import_table' '53'
leads to the following calls:
config_cb ex
Hi,
I am currently writing an init script using the callback method [1], on
BB-rc3. However, it does not seem possible to use "-" in a section name,
for instance:
config interface 'tun-test'
option 'rxcost' '42'
The "config_cb" function never gets called for this section (but
"option_cb
It has been compile-tested only so far. Please give it a try.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
.../0334-video-da8xx-fb-adding-dt-support.patch| 203 +
...-fb-Add-API-to-register-wait-for-vsync-ca.patch | 91 +
...-fb-fix-defect-with-vsync-callback-invoca.patch |
This switches to kernel 3.10 that was prepared by Hauke in:
gemini: add support for kernel 3.10
This is compile tested only, please run test and report back.
I've simply checked if it still compiles, unfortunately we didn't get
any feedback for this target.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
* Weimarnetz e.V., Vorstand/Vereinsvorsitzender: Bastian Bittorf
[27.08.2014 09:42]:
> can somebody explain this? bye, bastian
digging through 'target/linux/ramips'
i can see, that all boards are CPU_TYPE:=24kec
but only 1 board 'rt288x' is CPU_TYPE:=mips32r2
(so '24kec' is a special subtype of
i stumbled in a custom script over this problem:
root@fonera2n:~ opkg status kernel
Package: kernel
Version: 3.10.34-1-9ab8a27dee25ed0e5197bf83aebd96c3
Depends: libc
Status: install hold installed
Architecture: ramips_24kec
Installed-Time: 1396519878
# so the platform/architacture name is 'ramips
14 matches
Mail list logo
