Backports commit
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/9837baa99717c7526e4bae9c68e8728dea4af183
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
---
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/020-ssb_update.patch
b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.10/020-ssb_update.patch
index 354034a..6e93b9a 100644
As of 3.14.9 unregister_netdevice_many() in net/core/dev.c includes a
list_del(). This means that any code that calls ieee80211_remove_interfaces()
will oops when using 3.14 kernels newer than 3.14.9. Check that kernel
version is not a 3.14.x newer than 3.14.8 before adding list_del() in
iee
Jiri,
Thanks for the patience. I had never sent an email patch via git before and
I had problems so I sent them pasted into an email sent manually.
Apparently that didn't work :)
Is there any plan to add the telephony feed to Github like some of the
other OpenWrt feeds? It potentially could incre
Am 05.11.2014 17:39, schrieb obconseil:
Le 05/11/2014 16:41, Guillaume Déflache a écrit :
[...]
For others' to understand I should have made clear the library itself
builds fine, only the host's `protoc` does not get installed.
It would not help, 2.4.1 of AA worked fine, only the Makefile's n
Applied in telephony repository, thanks!
Your patch was not applicable via:
wget http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/6607/mbox/ -O - | git am -s
so I merged you changes manually.
Jiri
Dne 05/11/2014 v 21:27 Eric Schultz napsal(a):
> [PATCH] Updated a few of the PKG_LICENSE tags to be more accur
From b4e061d93e2628ecf9906731fa9849394237ea52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Schultz
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:08:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Updated a few of the PKG_LICENSE tags to be more accurate
To: openwrt-de...@openwrt.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Schultz
---
libs/bcg729/Makefile | 2
Shouldn't there be declared "proto_config_add_string ifname" somewhere
at the /lib/netifd/proto/ncm.sh ? and use that as argument somewhere
in here:
echo "ncm[$$]" "Connected, starting DHCP"
proto_init_update "*" 1
proto_send_update "$interface"
And something similar for t
Le 05/11/2014 16:41, Guillaume Déflache a écrit :
You were the fastest to respond so you indeed ought to stay the
maintainer! ;)
;-)
For others' to understand I should have made clear the library itself
builds fine, only the host's `protoc` does not get installed.
It would not help, 2.4.
Am 05.11.2014 15:32, schrieb obconseil:
Hello,
Le 05/11/2014 12:37, Guillaume Déflache a écrit :
[As I am not sure Jacob and Obinou (the package's registered maintainer)
are the same person (are they?), I am trying to CC to both too...]
No we are not :-)
You were the fastest to respond so
Hello,
Le 05/11/2014 12:37, Guillaume Déflache a écrit :
[As I am not sure Jacob and Obinou (the package's registered maintainer)
are the same person (are they?), I am trying to CC to both too...]
No we are not :-)
We are actually trying migrating from a few-months-old trunk snapshot to
the
Hi all
[As I am not sure Jacob and Obinou (the package's registered maintainer)
are the same person (are they?), I am trying to CC to both too...]
We are actually trying migrating from a few-months-old trunk snapshot to
the official Barrier Breaker release, and on BB protobuf does not work
11 matches
Mail list logo
