ok, took the freedom to set up another vote, incl. the third option. let's see
what the numbers say in a few days.
http://doodle.com/9d262b569bh4r7kv
it'd make sense that everybody retakes the vote to have the truest election
result.
regards ..ede
David Hutchison dhutchi...@bluemesh.net writes:
Hello John,
One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware revision
that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-340u-linux/ ) We had
to downgrade the firmware on the 340u
Hi Martin,
thanks for diggin' in the proprietary dirt and extracting all the
legally possible info for each firmware file.
I also got some VRX200 boards flying around here, most of them in
productive use on VDSL2 lines. However, I might give your updated
driver a try once I'm awake during less
On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
David Hutchison dhutchi...@bluemesh.net writes:
Hello John,
One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-340u-linux/ ) We
John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org writes:
On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
David Hutchison dhutchi...@bluemesh.net writes:
Hello John,
One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org writes:
On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
David Hutchison dhutchi...@bluemesh.net writes:
Hello John,
One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no
---
cli.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cli.c b/cli.c
index e6b34d7..cb107b7 100644
--- a/cli.c
+++ b/cli.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ mbim_subscriber_response(void *buffer, int len)
if (le32toh(state-readyinfo)
That was a bit too quick of course. Here's a small set of patches which
should fix both errors and help debugging similar issues.
Bjørn Mork (3):
fix subscriber response segfault
add command done status to verbose output
avoid parsing InformationBuffer unless status is success
cli.c
The MBIM specification requires that the InformationBuffer
is empty unless the status field is MBIM_STATUS_SUCCESS,
except for 4 explicit combinations of status code and
command id.
Avoid calling the reply handler if the status code is
non-zero and the information buffer is empty.
Signed-off-by:
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no
---
mbim-dev.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mbim-dev.c b/mbim-dev.c
index 4c129b0..f4b26eb 100644
--- a/mbim-dev.c
+++ b/mbim-dev.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ mbim_recv(struct uloop_fd *u, unsigned int events)
{
On 07/04/2015 15:22, Bjørn Mork wrote:
That was a bit too quick of course. Here's a small set of patches which
should fix both errors and help debugging similar issues.
Bjørn Mork (3):
fix subscriber response segfault
add command done status to verbose output
avoid parsing
Dear All,
I have introduced a new file in the linux-3.10.49/drivers/leds directory for
SATA LED toggling.
I however find that the callback registered for LED activity is not getting
called.
Underneath is the snippet of code and the function in RED is the one that I am
talking about.
I do see
On 07/04/2015 15:50, Deepanjan Kar wrote:
Dear All,
I have introduced a new file in the linux-3.10.49/drivers/leds directory
for SATA LED toggling.
I however find that the callback registered for LED activity is not
getting called.
Underneath is the snippet of code and the
Apparently this was actually just some confusion at Data Alliance--
looks like they may have mistakenly tried to flash some 16/64 boards
with the procedure for the 8/32 boards (which doesn't port cleanly).
I got in touch with someone at Alfa who affirmed that the only change
that they've made was
None of the LEDs are enabled by default on the Hornet-UB X2 board
(the 16/64MB version of the Hornet-UB), because it uses a different
board-name (hornet-ub-x2); but hornet-ub and hornet-ub-x2 boards
are equivalent WRT their LEDs.
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds
We have an openwrt build that we're working with, that has the most recent
compat-wireless from the trunk (package/kernel/mac80211).
When we load the ath10k driver, it seems to pause for several seconds and write
out a message about not finding a particular firmware file:
[6.418730]
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer
+1
On 07/04/2015 16:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Oh, sorry, forgot to mention that. It's a custom Intel-based platform (based
on an Atom Rangeley reference design, with a PCIe Ath10k card from Compex,
based on a QCA9880).
On Apr 7, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Irfan Zia irfan...@gmail.com wrote:
Which platform ? Is it a TP-Link device ? We did
+1
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer
+1 for Designated Driver
Aaron Z
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations,
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes
properly, manually as seems necessary.
+1 for Designated Driver
..ede
PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015
+1
- Original Message -
From: edgar soldin edgar.sol...@web.de
To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
+1
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200
From: Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de
To: edgar.sol...@web.de,
OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
That Doodle poll turned out to be
+1
Hartmut Knaack schrieb am 07.04.2015 um 21:47:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 04-04-15 14:45, shengkai wrote:
hi Maintainer and All,
We are an open source hardware team come from china, and we developed
an open source route board using MT7620A soc. In order to support this
new board officially, we plan to sumbit the special code for our
prodcut to openwrt branch.
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer.
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
Pete.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
+1
Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de hat geschrieben:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer.
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
There are three different subthreads, each looking for answers on
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned
+1
--
Marc Nicholas
CTO, Wimoto Technologies Inc.
Unit 2, 300 Don Park Road, Markham, Ontario L3R 3A1 CANADA
+1.416.414.6272
On April 7, 2015 at 5:11:55 PM, Daniel Golle (dan...@makrotopia.org) wrote:
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
+1
On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically
+1
Em ter, 7 de abr de 2015 às 18:15, Daniel Petre daniel.pe...@gmail.com
escreveu:
+1
On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could
even
change or delete other votes.
On 08.04.2015 00:45, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer.
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
There are three
+1 for Designated Driver
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:51:11 +0200, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
i am really wondering if the core devs are following this or even give a
damn. didn't read anything after John's last mail declaring Dirty
Diamond the winner. Felix, John, anybody?
Well, given I'm the one to blame for all the
On 08.04.2015 00:33, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer.
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
simply write your vote in the subject and have a mail body that
+1 for Designated Driver
On 15-04-07 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you
+1
xxiao
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
xxiao
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
46 matches
Mail list logo
