Backport for the Spansion S25FL164K
It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney
---
target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/091-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-Spansion_S25FL164K
| 10 ++
target/linux/generic/patches-4.0/091-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-Span
OK Thanks
I'll try to fix it ... I need it for the Bitmain Antminer S3 :)
Larry
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 07:00, John Crispin wrote:
> > On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>> O
On 29 June 2015 at 07:00, John Crispin wrote:
> On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney wrote:
It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki
On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki hasn't
>>> been picked up.
>>
>> I don't pick/backp
On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
>>
>> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki hasn't
>> been picked up.
>
> I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so:
> 1) Please drop your comp
On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney wrote:
> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
>
> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki hasn't been
> picked up.
I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so:
1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message
2) Backport this patch to
This patch adds support for the Bitmain Antminer S3 Cryptocurrency Miner
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/bitmain/s3
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney
---
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
| 3 +-
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds
It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors.
Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki hasn't been
picked up.
Tested-by: L. D. Pinney
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-
The thing is - this parameters I've got from hostapd.conf on my host
machine and due to comments they are strictly set from 802.11. As for
hostapd itself, I don't gone in deep inspection of WMM part but I saw
some default values regarding tx_queue* parameters (according to
comments this section is
Hi everybody!
I believe we all agree that the world is a mess.
Thus it's not very surprising that the currente state of crypto-
libraries *and their packaging* is just as messy as everything else.
However, especially in case of those libraries, one might want to be
very careful and choose a single
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:16:58PM +0300, N.Leiten wrote:
> As a result I got full 100Mbit/s on AR71XX platform and 70-80Mbit on
> Ralink. I think it is good performance improvement at this moment.
Interesting, thanks for sharing your results!
If these settings are generally diserable, maybe it m
Hi.
There's some general problem in hostapd configuration for several devices
was observed. In vanilla trunk versions of openwrt I got nearly 40-45Mbit/s
speed on Ralink RT5350 based devices and Atheros AR71xx platform (tp-link
wr841nd). The problem was in /var/run/hostapd-phy0.conf. It seems it i
On my Firewrt (MediaTek MT7621) cc-rc1 was booting up correctly.
cc-rc2 fails with kernel oops:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=gCWKmG3J cc-rc1 (working)
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=GSXXtPxd cc-rc2 (kernel oops)
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=t1qRjzPy r46133 trunk (kernel oops)
trunk is also brok
13 matches
Mail list logo
